Besieged by angry midgets who have rewritten all the definitions and are out to ban the dictionary.

March 26, 2012
The Crisis of Jewish Leftist Islamism (by Sultan Knish)(h/t Israel Jews and Judaism) There is a civil war among liberals, particularly Jewish liberals who are being edged out by the radical Anti-Jewish left… Beinart exonerates leftist Zionists and Anti-Zionists, telling the former that they were abandoned by the awful Jewish state and telling the latter that hating Israel is the truest expression of their liberal and Jewish values… Now the left is conducting its long march through Jewish institutions to make supporting Israel seem un-Jewish and transform bashing Israel into a Jewish value (MORE)

(Tablet)(Israel Jews and Judaism) Beinart quotes former Israeli foreign minister Shlomo Ben-Ami telling Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman that “If I were a Palestinian, I would have rejected Camp David as well.” Yet Ben-Ami said in the same interview that Yasser Arafat “was morally, psychologically, physically incapable of accepting the moral legitimacy of a Jewish state, regardless of its borders or whatever.” This goes unquoted. I suspect that’s because Beinart found it in The Israel Lobby by political scientists John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, which also quotes the first part of Ben-Ami’s statement but not the second.(MORE)

(Tablet)(h/t Israel Jews and Judaism) Beinart writes that the Strip “remains a place of brutal suffering.”, but New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof says, in a July 2010 column: “Visiting Gaza persuaded me, to my surprise, that Israel is correct when it denies that there is any full-fledged humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The tunnels have so undermined the Israeli blockade that shops are filled and daily life is considerably easier than when I last visited here two years.”(MORE)

(One State, Two States by Steven Bayme)(h/t Israel Jews Judaism) Beinart complains that AJC and other leading Jewish organizations invest far greater efforts attacking Palestinian one-statism than Christian or Jewish one-statism…. we disagree profoundly with the one-state solution of the Christian Right, we find Palestinian one-statism a greater danger precisely because it is articulated by people with whom Israel is expected to make peace(MORE)

Stupid Liberal problem… they think they need a state for Jew killers. There already are plenty. Hey… these are excerpts… I don’t agree with them. These are liberal ideologies that I am exploring here. I didn’t say they were sustainable. – Noah


Cultural Leftism

November 18, 2011
Theoretical leftism and class warfare was a lot less destructive then cultural leftism and class warfare. The Jews predominantly created Christianity and it was Christian culture that committed genocide on the Jews, likewise the Jews predominantly created leftism and class warfare and the end result is cultural leftism is trying to kill us now. Who were the National Socialists? Why are we not allowed to call them Socialists? …why, because it would offend Stalin. But even though we own the logic, the cultural horde marches on.

How Four Influential Socialist Anti-Semites Shaped the Left

July 16, 2011

“How Four Influential Socialist Anti-Semites Shaped the Left” looks at the impact that the bigotry of Karl Marx, H.G. Wells and the man who coined the word “Socialism” had on the modern left today.  Here are some excerpts from Sultan Knish

Even as the Nazi Holocaust had begun, H.G. Wells wrote in The New World Order (1940);
“The hostile reaction to the cult of the Chosen People is spreading about the entire world to-day… there has never been such a world-wide—I will not use the word anti-Semitism because of the Arab—I will say anti-Judaism… it is becoming world-wide and simultaneous… Until they are prepared to assimilate and abandon the Chosen People idea altogether, their troubles are bound to intensify.”

Hyndman founded England’s first Socialist political party, the Social Democratic Federation. He also went on to found the National Socialist Party, which eventually became part of the Labor Party.
Hyndman and the SDF’s newspaper “Justice” carried on a relentless campaign of attacks against Jews. What is unique about Hyndman is that he employed those attacks only as a cover for a larger anti-war movement.

Leroux is credited with coining the term, ‘Socialism’. He also expressed the idea of commerce as an original Jewish sin in the clearest of terms. To Leroux, banking was the original sin of the Jews. And therefore commerce was the Jewish spirit.

Fourier, the co-creator of French Socialism, would take this premise to its more explicit conclusion, writing; “Every government having regard to good morals ought to repress the Jews”.
Unlike Wells or Marx, Fourier and Leroux were not so much aspiring to a new order, as they were to a scientific application of an old order (this was more like Hitler’s view of a return to a classical ideal past). A return to a pre-commercial civilization based on cooperation, rather than competition. This would be impossible if commerce were a natural human form of resource organization and distribution. So it was necessary to theorize that commerce was something alien. A creation of the Jews.

Marx depicted Jews as the anti-thesis of Socialism, a theme that he was to repeatedly revisit, and more poisonously in such essays as “The Russian Loan”, where he implicitly suggested that war would continue for as long as the Jews existed.

Challenging the Leftist domination of the (American) Jewish community

April 10, 2011
SUPER JEW (Super Jews) - A Jewish/Israeli Superhero (Superheroes).

Politicians are impressed with groups that take pride in and make no apologies for who they are and what they stand for. Hillel’s aphorism “if I am not for myself, who am I?” is a lesson that many Jews need to relearn. Including a spiritual leader(s) or advisor(s) may also strengthen the authoritative nature of such an organization’s positions, especially if they are well respected.

Norwegian Parliament vice president Akhtar Chaudry to participate in Gaza convoy

April 8, 2011
gaza pool opened on May 18, 2010 source:Maan News
Lots of school kids in Oslo would love this kind of luxury

Socialist Left Member of Parliament and Parliament Vice President Akhtar Chaudry confirms his plans to sail to Gaza in May.

Three other MPs from Labour party have previously announced their intention to do so: Anette Trettebergstuen, Hadia Tajik and Stine Renate Håheim.
Tajik writes in a text message to Vårt Land that it is still not clear whether she will participate or not(unauthorized translation):

«Depending on timing and final arrangements of boat. Must know with certainty that everybody on board the boat are serious people, what kind of shipment, and who it will be delivered to (UN, not Hamas)».

Håheim confirms that she has signed up to join the convoy in May, but that it is still not clear whether she will be among the passengers.
Chaudry responds to a question on whether he can understand concerns that free access to Gaza can be used for smuggling weapons:

– Those who worry about this must also respond to concerns that 1,5 million imprisoned persons otherwise can get food and teaching material. My question is why the people of Gaza should be treated any differently than people in Oslo.

Chowdry’s co-vice president, Per Kristian Foss, Høyre, says it is inappropriate that the Vice President of the Norwegian Parliament participates in the convoy:

A member of the presidency ought to find other means to mark his position. Furthermore, Chaudry is a member of a governing party which has every opportunity to influence Israel through political decisions. Such actions can easily be interpreted as a one-sided support for Hamas.

Opposition MPs are very concerned this will be used against Norway in other fora. Hans Olav Syversen, Christian Democrats and member of Friends of Israel in Parliament says

The organization behind the convoy has been condemned, among others in Germany, because what seemingly was humanitarian help, in reality was help for Hamas. Medical supplies were beyond the date of expiry, and there were other things in the shipment that not of a humanitarian character, such as knives, bats, welding machines.

The final words go to Chaudry, when asked if he agrees that inappropriate of the VP of the Norwegian Parliament to participate in the convoy:

For me as an SV representative, the most important matter is that all positions are used to support the Palestinian people. Nobody have been treated more unfairly than the children of Gaza.

So, when these absolutely spineless politicos set sail for the sunny shores of Gaza, they may want to take a few minutes to reflect on the lack of civil liberties, including gay rights in Gaza, plot a plan to release Gilad Shalit who has been illegally kept since 2006, and obviously keep their eyes open for ships like the Victoria, heaven forbid that our MPs get themselves involved in illegal arms smuggling.
Prof. M. McGonagall
Finally,I permit myself to copy from Tom Gross’s political blog to show the falseness of the ludicrous claim that Gaza children suffer more than anybody else:

FOX Claims Penélope Cruz Will Bear “Anchor Baby,” Latino Republicans Protest

December 19, 2010

Our political discourse suffers from an impasse prohibiting genuine progress. That impasse is political correctness or, more accurately, cultural Marxism. It is the priority of emotion over reason. It is the assertion that, if someone is offended by an argument or the language used to articulate it, the argument is inherently incorrect. It is a retarding force upon intellect.

Political correctness is an effective force because most decent people do not want to offend and will make what seem to be reasonable concessions in order to maintain civility. There is also a tendency to confuse arguments based on emotion with arguments appealing to emotion. For instance, the argument against the Ground Zero Mosque appeals to the emotional impact its construction will have upon survivors of the Islamist attacks of September 11, 2001. That is not the argument’s basis, however. If Imam Rauf’s claim that he desires to build bridges between the West and Islam is correct, his insistence upon a course which agitates is illogical.
Political correctness is used like a sucker punch to unduly handicap one side of a debate. It is a tactic which emerged from the Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School in the early 20th century, with the objective of destroying our existing culture. We must therefore wonder why an ostensibly conservative organization would employ the tactic.
¡Somos Republicans!, a Hispanic group, has taken issue with Fox News Latino’s use of the term “anchor baby” in a headline referencing actress Penélope Cruz. She and husband Javier Bardem are opting to deliver their son in the United States rather than in Spain.

[Journalist Christina] Tárrega explained that the actors’ wish is for their son to have dual citizenship, and since the two own an estate in Hollywood — and Spain grants citizenship to foreign born if a parent is born in Spain — it is quite a convenient situation.

The citizenship status of Cruz and Bardem is not reported. Their status is relevant toward determining whether or not Fox News Latino’s use of the term “anchor baby” is accurate. However, ¡Somos Republicans!’ objection is not based on this criteria.

The term “anchor baby” is equivalent to other defamatory terms such as “wetback”, “pickaninny” and “tar baby”.  Media outlets should never use these demeaning terms in connection with precious babies, and it is unfortunate that we have to inform FOX News of this when they are typically viewed as conservative.

Next: The difference between defamatory and descriptive…

Posted via email from noahdavidsimon’s posterous

Leave a Comment » | anchor babies, anchor baby, Cultural Marxism, Hispanic Republicans, Hispanics, Immigration, Javier Bardem, Penelope Cruz, Political Correctness, Somos Republicans, Tactics of the Left | Permalink
Posted by Noah Simon