Michael Coren answers Whoopi Goldberg’s statement about how perfect communism is on paper.

December 24, 2011
(Chris Jones via VladTepes):Whoopi Goldberg has the ability to look very intelligent and wise, but it’s all an act. She is tragically uneducated and wouldn’t know a critical thought if it bit her on the nose. I mean, she could play – and probably has – a Nobel Prize-winning professor without difficulty, but she can’t think her way out of a paper bag. I guess that’s why they call it “acting”. What she’s doing here is making the tired point that collectivist state-ism looks a lot better on paper than it turns out to be, which is true, but whatever. I find it irritating that people like her never seem to know any of the stuff that Michael Coren lists on the video. Why not? I’ll tell you why not. Whoopi just starts shouting like a game-show contestant the minute anybody says anything intelligent within her hearing range.

Marx: What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.…. Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man – and turns them into commodities…. The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange…. The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.
Marx: It was in his article, “The Russian Loan,” published in the New-York Daily Tribune on January 4, 1856, that the grotesque antisemitism of Karl Marx’s writing was on full display:
Thus we find every tyrant backed by a Jew, as is every pope by a Jesuit. In truth, the cravings of oppressors would be hopeless, and the practicability of war out of the question, if there were not an army of Jesuits to smother thought and a handful of Jews to ransack pockets.
… the real work is done by the Jews, and can only be done by them, as they monopolize the machinery of the loanmongering mysteries by concentrating their energies upon the barter trade in securities… Here and there and everywhere that a little capital courts investment, there is ever one of these little Jews ready to make a little suggestion or place a little bit of a loan. The smartest highwayman in the Abruzzi is not better posted up about the locale of the hard cash in a traveler’s valise or pocket than those Jews about any loose capital in the hands of a trader… The language spoken smells strongly of Babel, and the perfume which otherwise pervades the place is by no means of a choice kind.
… Thus do these loans, which are a curse to the people, a ruin to the holders, and a danger to the governments, become a blessing to the houses of the children of Judah. This Jew organization of loan-mongers is as dangerous to the people as the aristocratic organization of landowners… The fortunes amassed by these loan-mongers are immense, but the wrongs and sufferings thus entailed on the people and the encouragement thus afforded to their oppressors still remain to be told.
… The fact that 1855 years ago Christ drove the Jewish moneychangers out of the temple, and that the moneychangers of our age enlisted on the side of tyranny happen again chiefly to be Jews, is perhaps no more than a historical coincidence. The loan-mongering Jews of Europe do only on a larger and more obnoxious scale what many others do on one smaller and less significant. But it is only because the Jews are so strong that it is timely and expedient to expose and stigmatize their organization.


Michael Coren: Toronto plans Islamic hate fest

October 13, 2011




(h/t Vlad Tepes)

A Poor Comparison:

March 17, 2011

The Jewish people were exiled in 79 AD by the Romans during a Jewish revolt. This was the same period in which the second temple was destroyed. The Jewish people of the 21st century have inherited a right to return to Palestine, from descendants from almost 2000 years earlier.By refusing to acknowledge the rights of the descendants of Palestinian refugees to return to their ancestral home a mere 62 years after their parents and grandparents were driven out, Michael Coren not only delegitimized the right of Jews to return to Palestine after 2000 years of being exiled, but also delegitimized Zionism as an ideology.

This argument only works within it’s own accepted context which is that the Jewish diaspora had a parallel to the Palestinian one. Did the Jewish refugees of Israel 2000 years ago find themselves forced to leave their own homes by their own Jewish leaders? Obviously not, so how could the two experiences be compared? Were the Jews forced to live in lands with other Jews who didn’t want Judea Jews around them? no… of course not. The denied correlative is that the Jews did not force themselves out of Israel.