Remember the Khaibar?

July 11, 2013

Khaiber,” which is currently being aired on the satellite network Dubai TV, the Algerian 3 station and Dream TV, is a multi-million dol­lar tele­vi­sion series produced by Echo Media Qatar that dramatizes the battle between Muslims and the Jews of the town of Khaiber in Arabia and depicts Jews as the enemy of Islam. According to some traditional Islamic sources, the battle ended with the exe­cu­tion of thou­sands of Jews and their ultimate subjugation. Episodes aired to date have revealed classic anti-Semitic motifs, including a Jewish conspiracy to undermine Arabs, as well as depicting Jews as cheap, greedy and immoral.


Hebron and Iran juxtaposition by @YidWithLid: illustrates How Arabs don’t just hate Ashkenazis

August 18, 2011
In Aug 1929, The Arabs Massacred the Jews Of Hebron While the British Watched


…Davar newspaper of August 20, 1929:

…The unrest among the Arabs of Hebron was very strong, particularly after the motor cars began to arrive from Jerusalem with news of disturbances.

Incitement of feeling against the Jews goes on, particularly round Jerusalem and Hebron. Rumors are being spread by unknown persons that on Saturday last the Jews cursed the Moslem religion and that it is the duty of Moslems to take revenge.

Rabbi Ya’acov Slonim, head of the Sephardic Jewish community, and Rabbi Frank, head of the Ashkenazic community, turned to the Arab Governor of Hebron, Abdullah Kardos. The Governor calmed us and said: “There is no fear of anything happening. The British Government knows what it has to do. In the place where two soldiers are needed, it sends six.” And he added: “I tell you in confidence that they have many soldiers in the streets, in civilian clothes; these soldiers circulate among the crowds, and in the hour of need they will fulfill their duty.”

But that promise was never backed up with action…
On Friday night August 23rd, Rabbi Ya’acov Slonim’s son invited any fearful Jews to stay in his house. The Rabbi was highly regarded in the community, and he had a gun. Many Jews took him up on this offer, and many Jews were eventually murdered in his home


On Saturday morning, before the slaughter began, the Rabbis again appealed to the Governor for help. Again they received the same astounding assurances. Bewildered, they turned to Mr. Cafferata, the British officer in charge of the Police. From him, too, they received assurances of safety.
As early as 8:00 a.m. on Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath, Arabs began to gather en masse. They came in mobs, armed with clubs, knives and axes. While the women and children threw stones, the men ransacked Jewish houses and destroyed Jewish property. With only a single police officer in Hebron, the Arabs entered Jewish courtyards with no opposition.
Rabbi Slonim, who had tried to shelter the Jewish population, was approached by the rioters and offered a deal. If all the Ashkenazi yeshiva students were given over to the Arabs, the rioters would spare the lives of the Sephardi community. Rabbi Slonim refused to turn over the students and was killed on the spot. In the end, 12 Sephardi Jews and 55 Ashkenazi Jews were murdered.

On hearing screams in a room I went up a sort of tunnel passage and saw an Arab in the act of cutting off a child’s head with a sword. He had already hit him and was having another cut, but on seeing me he tried to aim the stroke at me, but missed; he was practically on the muzzle of my rifle. I shot him low in the groin. Behind him was a Jewish woman smothered in blood with a man I recognized as a[n Arab] police constable named Issa Sherif from Jaffa in mufti. He was standing over the woman with a dagger in his hand. He saw me and bolted into a room close by and tried to shut me out-shouting in Arabic, “Your Honor, I am a policeman.” … I got into the room and shot him.” (Bernard Wasserstein, The British in Palestine: The Mandatory Government and the Arab-Jewish Conflict 1917-1929, Oxford England, Basil Blackwell, 1991)
Now let me tell you about the massacre. Right after eight o’clock in the morning we heard screams. Arabs had begun breaking into Jewish homes. The screams pierced the heart of the heavens. We didn’t know what to do. Our house had two floors. We were downstairs and a doctor lived on the second floor.We figured that we would be safe in the doctor’s apartment, but how could we get up there? The stairs were on the outside of the building, but it wasn’t safe to go out. So we chopped through the ceiling and that way we climbed up to the doctor’s house. Well, after being there only a little while, we realized that we were still in danger because by that time the Arabs had almost reached our house. They were going from door to door, slaughtering everyone who was inside. The screams and the moans were terrible. People were crying Help! Help! But what could we do? There were thirty‑three of us. Soon, soon, all of us would be lost.  Letter of a Survivor

Read on further by clicking here for an explanation of how this is much like the situation and promises of the United Nations today and how our more “liberal jews” and military leaders like Moshe Dayan in the 1960’s do not help either and try to play politics because they are strategically weak at the Yid With Lid. Thank you so much Jeff for compiling this information.  Too often we hear about how before the state of Israel that the Arabs and Jews supposedly got along. Hebron is often mentioned, but has links to sources!!!!! My one criticism is the plaque at the end of the post that makes the claim that the Muslims were not behaving “in accordance with the commandments of the Koran”.   Whoever wrote that plaque had never read that book.  I remember the Khaibar!

This Ongoing War: Incoming Qassam again – Rockets called Khaibar?

September 7, 2010

survival is dependent on attacking back.  I just thought about something…. they called the rockets KhaibarDoes anyone know the significance to that?

noahdavidsimon’s posterous

Leave a Comment » | Khaibar, Qassams | Permalink
Posted by Noah Simon


We are not SUCKERS!

September 1, 2010

Khaibar is an ancient town on the Arabian Peninsula. In 629, Mohammad’s soldiers attacked the Jews barricaded in the city. A year earlier, Mohammad signed the Treaty of Hudaybiyya with the Jews, promising them to live in peace while telling his followers this was the right path: Sign agreements when the Jewish enemy is strong and bide your time.

When Mohammad conquered Khaibar, he executed all the men, the women (including the girls) were brutally raped, and boys were sold to slavery. This event was deeply etched in Islamic imperialism’s consciousness, and the song “Khaibar, Khaibar, oh Jews, Mohammad’s army shall return” has been used as a battle cry since 629 and until the Mavi Marmara days.

they just do it again… and again… and again 

noahdavidsimon’s posterous
Muhammad, the prophet of Islam and the apostle of Allah, had
ordered at least 60 raids and wars often involving massacres and personally participated in 27 of them. The exemplary example and the perfection of
humanity and the prototype of the most wonderful human conduct
that he was—Muhammad massacred, beheaded, tortured, terrorized,
raped, and looted in the name of God. Described below  are
three of his massacres and a partial listing of his sex-slaves from the Muslim holy books and Islamic
writings.
  • In the Massacre of Banu Quraiza, Muhammad order the beheading
    of 600 to 900 adult men (determined by pubic-hair growth) and he
    himself chopped off a few heads. He enslaved all the women and
    children of the Jewish tribe. The women were kept as sex-slaves
    with Muhammad himself taking a beautiful Jewish woman as his own
    sex-slave and sold the rest of the captives into slavery. He also
    looted the property of the murdered Jews and took possession of
    all their wealth and properties. Allah, like a godfather and mafia
    chieftain of the Muhammad’s criminal gang, rejoiced this barbarous
    and heinous acts of slaughtering the Jews and enslavement of their
    women and children by creating 5 teachings in the Koran as the
    Eternal Laws of God.
  • At the Massacre of Khaybar, Muhammad brutally tortured a
    Jewish chieftain for extracting information about where he had
    hidden his treasures. When the treasure was uncovered, the
    chieftain was beheaded. This chieftain was the husband of the most
    beautiful Jewish woman of Khaybar, the 17-year-old Safiyaah.
    Safiyaah’s family members had been annihilated by Muhammad at the
    Banu Qurayza massacre. Now having beheaded her husband, the
    Prophet took Safiyah as his sex-slave and copulated on the same
    night.
  • In the massacre of the Jewish Settlement of Bani Mustaliq,
    Muhammad captured their women and took twenty-year-old Jewish
    girl, Juwayriya as his sex-slave.

THE MASSACRE OF BANU QURAIZA

Angel Gabriel Appears To Muhammad And Orders Him To Attack The
Rich Jewish Settlement Of Banu Quraiza

Sahi Bukhari :Volume 5, Book 59, Number 443:

Narrated ‘Aisha:

When the Prophet returned from the battle of Al-Khandaq (i.e.
Trench) and laid down his arms and took a bath, Gabriel came and
said (to the Prophet), “you have laid down your arms? By Allah, we
angels have not laid them down yet. So set out for them.” The
Prophet said, “Where to go?” Gabriel said, “Towards this side,”
pointing towards Banu Quraiza. So the Prophet went out towards
them. (Book 019, Number 4368)

Sahi Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 444:

Narrated Anas:

“As if I am just now looking at the dust rising in the street of
Banu Ghanm (in Medina) because of the marching of Gabriel’s
regiment when Allah’s Apostle set out to Banu Quraiza (to attack
them).”

These traditions about Gabriel’s leadership are designed to give
divine support for the atrocity that Muhammad was about to be unleashed
upon Banu Qurayza.
Today, we may see this as fanciful, but to millions of Muslims this
is real and divine.

Muhammad Besieges Banu Quraiza For 25 Days. After The Jews
Unconditionally Surrender All Men Are Beheaded, Women and Young
Girls Raped and Sold into Slavery. Their Property was Looted.

Sahi Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 448

So Allah’s Apostle went to them (i.e. Banu Quraiza) (i.e. besieged
them). They then surrendered to the Prophet’s judgment
(unconditionally after 25 days of fierce resistance) but he
directed them to Sad (ally) to give his verdict concerning them.
Sad said, “I give my judgment that their warriors should be
killed, their women and children should be taken as captives, and
their properties distributed.”

The Prophet said, “You have judged according to the King’s
(Allah’s) judgment.” (Hadith No. 447, Vol. 5)

The sentence was Death by decapitation for around 300—600 men and
pubescent boys, and enslavement for the women and children. Ibn
Ishaq says that the number may have been as high as 800—900 (p.
464).

The text of Sirat [Ibn Ishaq, page 464]:

Then they surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina
in the quarter of d. al-Harith, a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the
apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its
market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and
struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out
to him in batches. Among them was the enemy of Allah Huyayy b.
Akhtab and Ka`b b. Asad their chief. There were 600 or 700 in all,
though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. As they were
being taken out in batches to the apostle they asked Ka`b what he
thought would be done with them. He replied, ‘Will you never
understand? Don’t you see that the summoner never stops and those
who are taken away do not return? By Allah it is death!’ This went
on until the apostle made an end of them.

Huyayy was brought out wearing a flowered robe in which he had
made holes about the size of the finger-tips in every part so that
it should not be taken from him as spoil, with his hands bound to
his neck by a rope. When he saw the apostle he said, ‘By God, I do
not blame myself for opposing you, but he who forsakes God will be
forsaken.’ Then he went to the men and said, ‘God’s command is
right. A book and a decree, and massacre have been written against
the Sons of Israel.’ Then he sat down and his head was struck off.

Muhammad ordered and participated in the digging of the trench
into which the massacred Jews were to be thrown. He STRUCK OFF the
heads of at least two of those captives.

 

How Did The SS Jihadist Executioners Decide on Which Jewish
Boys To Slaughter Or Leave Alive To Be Sold Into Slavery

To separate the young Jewish men from the minors, Muhammad
ordered that their pants be pulled down and the youngsters genital
area examined SS style for pubic hairs and if they had grown any
pubic hair, it was enough to behead them.

Book 38, Number 4390:

Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:

I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions)
examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were
killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those
who had not grown hair.

Aisha’s Description of the Only Woman Murdered: She was
Delirious Because Her Husband Had Just Been Beheaded. She was taken
by the SS Jihadist and Beheaded.

Book 14, Number 2665:

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu’minin:

No woman of Banu Qurayzah was killed except one. She was with me,
talking and laughing on her back and belly (extremely), while the
Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) was killing her people with
the swords. Suddenly a man called her name: Where is so-and-so? I
asked: What is the matter with you? She said: I did a new act. The
man took her and beheaded her. I will not forget that she was
laughing extremely although she knew that she would be killed.

Muhammad Took One Of The Jewish Women As His Sex-slave

The apostle had chosen one of their women for himself, Rayhana
bint Amr . . . one of the women of . . . Qurayza, and she remained
with him until she died, in his power. The apostle had proposed to
marry and put a veil on her, but she said: “Nay, leave me in your
power, for that will be easier for me and for you.” So he left
her. She had shown repugnance towards Islam when she was captured
and clung to Judaism. (Ibn Ishaq p. 466)

The Looted Property And The Jewish Women And Children Were
Divided Among the Muslims

More specifically, Ibn Ishaq says the spoils were divided among
the Muslims thus:

Then the apostle divided the property, wives, and children . .
. among the Muslims, and he made known on that day the shares of
horse and men, and took out the fifth. A horseman got three
shares, two for the horse and one for the rider. A man without a
horse got one share (p. 466). Then the apostle sent Sa’d b. Zayd
al-Ansari brother of b. ‘Abdu’l-Ashhal with some of the captive
women of B. Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and
weapons. [page 466]

Allah Allows Muhammad and His Jihadists To Have Sex With Their
Sex-slaves

Allah also allows jihadists to have sex with female slaves.
Sources: Ibn Ishaq, pp. 464-66; Tabari, vol. 8, pp. 27-41.

Muhammad Enriches Himself

Muhammad had captured huge spoils from his “final solution” of
Jews of Banu Qurayza. Muhammad gets one-fifth of the Jewish
property (movable, immovable and human), and his jihadist followers
get the rest. The tribe of Banu Qurayza likely consisted of about
500 families, who were wealthiest in Medina. Therefore, Muhammad
enriched himself with the wealth of about 100 rich families as well as
their women and children from this single act of successful Jihad.

Here is how Allah sanctions the enrichment of Muhammad and his
Jihadist followers from his expedition:

Quran-8:41— “And know that out of all the booty that ye may
acquire (in war), a fifth share is assigned to Allah,- and to the
Messenger, and to near relatives, orphans, the needy, and the
wayfarer,- if ye do believe in Allah and in the revelation We sent
down to Our servant on the Day of Testing,- the Day of the meeting
of the two forces. For Allah hath power over all things.

Why Does Muhammad Not Show Mercy?

It is Allah who guides Muhammad into committing these heinous,
barbaric cruelty against the people of Arabia. Below are a list of
Allah’s commands to Muhammad to carry out those acts of carnage:

Allah celebrates this slaughter and enslavement of the Jews in
the Koran:

Quran-33:25- “Allah turned back the unbelievers [Meccans and
their allies] in a state of rage, having not won any good, and
Allah spared the believers battle. Allah is, indeed, Strong and
Mighty.”

Quran-33:26- “And He brought those of the People of the Book
[Jewish people of Banu Qurayza] who supported them from their
fortresses and cast terror into their hearts, some of them you
slew (beheaded) and some you took prisoners (captive)”

Quran-33:27- “And He made you heirs of their lands, their
houses, and their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented
(before). And Allah has power over all things.” [Merciful Allah
asked Prophet Muhammad to confiscate entire properties of
surrendered Jews]

Quran-8:67—“It is not fitting for an Apostle that he should
have prisoners of war until He thoroughly subdued the land….”
(Allah insisting Prophet to kill all the prisoners, and should not
keep any surrendered prisoners alive until He (Prophet) occupied
entire Arabia.”

Quran-8:17—It is not ye who Slew them; it is God; when thou
threwest a handful of dust, it was not Thy act, but God’s…..”
(Allah said, the killing of surrendered soldiers were done by the
wish of Allah)

These above Quranic verses revealed some unpleasant truths:

The verses: 33:25-27 were revealed to describe Banu Qurayza
incident and clearly talking about the unbelievers (Quresh pagans,
and their allies Jews of Banu Quraiza).  Specifically, verse-33:27 talks
of ow by the judgement of Sa’d ibn Muaz all the men were slaughtered and women
and children were captivated. And Jewish land and property were
taken as Booty….Sa’d delivered his justice according to Bible; hence
Muhammad said—“your judgement was like God.”

Allah permitted the enslavement and beheading of Jews, so any
Muslim familiar with the background of this verse knows that
beheading as such has been assimilated into the Quran.

What is so troubling about the verse 33:26 is that Allah
(Himself) celebrates the “terror” that He threw into the Jews’
hearts. Indeed, when Abu Lubabah the mediator approached the Jews
during negotiations, the women and children were crying. Allah of
course had heavily terrorized them.

The Prophet Muhammad had already expelled two other Jewish tribes
(Qaynuqa and Nadir) from Medina, and the Banu Qurayza Jews begged
for for the same punishment to them. But the Islam’s prophet of
peace and mercy declined this relatively more merciful and humane
option.

Such a heartless, evil incarnate was the prophet of Islam!

THE CONQUEST AND MASSACRE OF KHAYBAR

Muhammad Attacks The Rich Jewish Settlement of Khaybar Without
Warning and Takes Safiya As His Sex Slave After Murdering Her
Husband

Sahih Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512:

Narrated by Anas:

The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaybar when it was
still dark and then said, “Allahu-Akbar! Khaybar is destroyed, for
whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will
be the morning for those who have been warned.” Then the
inhabitants of Khaybar came out running on the roads. The Prophet
had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as
captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the
share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet .
The Prophet made her manumission as her ‘Mahr’. Muhammad was sixty
(60) when he married Safiyyahh, a young girl of seventeen. She
became his eighth wife.

Distribution Of War Booty In Khaybar:

Sahi Buchari Hadiths #143, page-700:

Sulaiman Ibne Harb…Aannas Ibne Malek (ra) narrated, “in the war
of Khayber after the inhabitants of Banu Nadir were surrendered,
Allah’s apostle killed all the able/adult men, and he (prophet)
took all women and children as captives (Ghani mateer maal)..
Among the captives Safiyya Bint Huyy Akhtab was taken by Allah’s
Apostle as booty whom He married after freeing her and her freedom
was her Mahr.”

At first Dihyah al-Kalbi, a Muslim Jihadist asked for Safiyyah.
But when Muhammad saw her exquisite beauty, he chose her for
himself and gave her two cousins to Dihyah.

 

Muhammad Horribly Tortured Safiya’s Husband To Get Information
About His Hidden Gold Treasure. He Was Beheaded After He Refused To
Give Up The Treasure.

Prophet Muhammad accused Safiyyah’s husband Kinanah of hiding
wealth, which he had received during his marriage with Safiyyah. A renegade Jew divulged the secret of Kinanah’s hidden
gold treasures to Muhammad. Kinanah and his cousin were captured and tortured by
Muhammad to extract information about the whereabouts of his
treasures. He was tormented by branding his chest with a heated
stake and then he was beheaded in Islamic style.

Sourcing Ibn Ishak, Tabari writes:

‘Kinanah b. al-Rabi b. al-Huqyaq who had the treasure of B. Nadir
was brought to the Messenger of God, who questioned him; but he
denied knowing where it was. Then the messenger of God was brought
a Jew who said to him, “I have seen Kinanah walk around this ruin
every morning.” The Messenger of God said to Kinanah: “What do you
say? If we find it in your possession, I will kill you.” “All
right,” he answered. The Messenger of God commanded that the ruin
should be dug up, and some of the treasure was extracted from it.
Then he asked him for the rest of it. Kinanah refused to surrender
it; so the Messenger of God gave orders concerning him to al-Zubayr
b. al-‘Awwam, saying, “torture him until you root out what he
has.” Al-Zubayr kept twirling his firestick in his breast until
Kinanah almost expired; then the Messenger of God gave him to
Muhammad b. Maslamah, who beheaded him to avenge his brother
Mahmud b. Maslamah.”‘

The Looted Property And Women And Children Were Distributed Among
The Jihadists:

Muhammad now allowed the Muslim Jihadists to take possession of
the women and children of the Jews of Khaybar.

Allah’s Messenger occupied the Jewish land:

Sahih Muslim writes:Book 010, Number 3759:

Ibn Umar (Allah be pleased with them) reported: Allah’s Messenger
(may peace be upon him) handed over the land of Khaibar (on the
condition) of the share of produce of fruits and harvest, and he
also gave to his wives every year one hundred wasqs: eighty wasqs
of dates and twenty wasqs of barley. When ‘Umar became the caliph
he distributed the (lands and trees) of Khaibar, and gave option
to the wives of Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) to earmark
for themselves the land and water or stick to the wasqs (that they
got) every year. They differed in this matter. Some of them opted
for land and water, and some of them opted for wasqs every year. ‘A’isha
and Hafsa were among those who opted for land and water.

Enjoying special Booty (Gani-maater-maal): Muhammad Takes Safiya
As Booty To Be His Sex Slave

Safiya bint Huyai/Huyayy was a captive Mohammed married after
slaughtering her father, brother, husband and the men at Khaibar,
according to Bukhari vol.2 book 14 ch.5 no.68 p.35; vol.4 book 52
ch.74 no.143 p.92; vol.4 book 52 ch.168 no.280 p.175 and Tabari
vol.39 p.185.

Muhammad at 60 Takes 17-Year-Old Safiyah as Sex-slave

After securing beautiful Safiyaah daughter of Huyayy for himself,
Prophet Muhammad bedded her in his tent on the same night. Here is
the story: Merciful Prophet asked Bilal, the Negro crier
of prayer to fetch Safiyyah to his (Muhammad’s) camp. Bilal brought
Safiyyah and her cousin straight across the battlefield strewn with
dead-bodies, passing by the corpses of Kinana and his cousin. The
two cousins of Safiyyah shrieked in horror when they
witnessed the gruesome scene of the dead-bodies of their dear and
near relatives. When brought to his presence, Muhammad cast his
mantle around Safiyyah indicating that she was to be his own.
Muhammad consoled a frustrated Dhiya by giving him Safiyyah’s cousin
sisters. According to Ibn Sa’d Prophet Muhammad purchased Safiyyah
from Dhiyah for seven camels. On the same night, Muhammad took
Safiyyah to bed. This was, of course, an exemplary  character
of the holy Prophet of Islam!

Here is what Ibn Sa’d writes:

“-.when it was night, he entered a tent and she entered with
him. Abu Ayyub came there and passed the night by the tent with a
sword keeping his head at the tent. When it was morning and the
Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him.”

To hide the lascivious character of Muhammad, Muslim biographers
often mention that he married Safiyyahh before he slept with her.
But they forget to mention that Muhammad did not follow the rule of
waiting period (three monthly periods) to sleep with Safiyyahh. He
slept with her the same day she was captured.

Islamic Intolerance: Kill All The Jews: The First Final Solution

  • Book 019, Number 4366:

    It has been narrated by ‘Umar b. al-Khattib that he heard the
    Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say: “I will expel the
    Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave
    any but Muslim.” [This single sahi hadiths tells everything about
    Islamic intolerance]

     

  • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 176 Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “You (i.e. Muslims) will fight with the Jews
    till some of them will hide behind stones. The stones will (betray
    them) saying, ‘O ‘Abdullah (i.e. slave of Allah)! There is a Jew
    hiding behind me; so kill him.’ “

     

  • “the Apostle of Allah said, ‘Kill any Jew that falls into your
    power.” [Ibn Ishaq, Siratul Rasul, v. 553]

THE MASSACRE OF BANU MUSTALIQ

Muhammad Attacks The Jewish Settlement of Banu Mustaliq: He
Captures And Rapes A Twenty Year Old Jewish Girl – Juwairiya

Bukhari yol 3,Book46, No. 717

“Narrated Ibn Aun:

Prophet had suddenly attacked Banu Mustaliq without warning while
they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the
places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women
and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on
that day and raped her.

Juwairiya bint Harith/al-Harith was a captive in this raid, [Bukhari 3.46.13.717, p431-432]. Sahih Muslim 2.2349, p.520 says
that Mohammed attacked the Banu Mustaliq tribe without any warning
while they were heedlessly grazing their cattle. Juwairiya was a
daughter of the chief. Sahih Muslim 3.4292, p.942 and Abu Dawud 2.227,
p728 and al-Tabari 39, p.182-183 also say Juwairiya/Juwairiyyah was captured in a raid on the Banu Mustaliq
tribe. She had been married to Musafi’ bin Safwan, who was killed in
battle.

Juwayriyyah bint al-Harith bin Abi Birar bin Habib, great
grandson of Jadhimah al-Mustaliq of the Khuza’ah group, was taken as
booty when Muslims raided the al-Mustaliq tribe. Her husband, Musafi’
bin Safwan Dhu al-Shuir bin Abi Asrb bin Malik bin Jadhimah was
killed in the battle. She was a prisoner of war who agreed to marry
Mohammed. al-Tabari 39:p182-183; al-Tabari 9:p133.

Juwayriyya married Mohammed when she was 20 years old. al-Tabari 39:p184.

SEX SLAVES: MUHAMMAD AND THOSE HIS RIGHT HAND POSSESSES

  • Sahih Bukhari: Volume 9, Book 93, Number 506:

    Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:

    That during the battle with Bani Al-Mustaliq they (Muslims)
    captured some females and intended to have sexual relation with
    them without impregnating them. So they asked the Prophet about
    coitus interrupt us. The Prophet said, “It is better that you
    should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create
    till the Day of Resurrection.” Qaza’a said, “I heard Abu Sa’id
    saying that the Prophet said, ‘No soul is ordained to be created
    but Allah will create it.”

     

  • Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 337:

    Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him):
    O Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon
    him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with
    Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the
    Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we
    desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives,
    (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we
    decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl
    (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to
    avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas
    Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked
    Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does
    not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born
    up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

  • Sunan Abu Dawud Book 11, Number 2166:

    Narrated AbuSa’id al-Khudri:

    A man said: Apostle of Allah, I have a slave-girl and I withdraw
    the penis from her (while having intercourse), and I dislike that
    she becomes pregnant. I intend (by intercourse) what the men
    intend by it. The Jews say that withdrawing the penis (azl) is
    burying the living girls on a small scale. He (the Prophet) said:
    The Jews told a lie. If Allah intends to create it, you cannot
    turn it away.

From Quran, “…abstain from sex, except with those joined to them
in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands
possess – for (in their case) they are free from blame,” Sura
23:5-6. See also Sura 4:24

“He [Mohammed] replied, ‘Conceal your private parts except from
your wife and from whom your right hands possess (slave-girls).’”
[Abu Dawud vol.3, no.4006, p.1123.]

Abu Dawud vol.3 no.4443-4445 p.1244 shows that having sex with a
slave-girl a man owns is fine.

As was typical of wealthy Arab men, Mohammed apparently had need
of a few slave girls too. See Bukhari vol.7 book 64 ch.6 no.274
p.210.

Mohammed briefly had a “very beautiful” captive before he gave
her to Mahmiyah b. Jaz’ al-Zubaydi. al-Tabari vol.8 p.151

One of the slave girls belonging to Mohammed house committed
fornication with someone else. It is the “someone else” part that
was a problem. Abu Dawud vol.3 no.4458 p.1249

Mohammed called a black slave-girl to come and conceal Abu Dharr
behind a curtain while he was taking a bath. Abu Dawud vol.1 no.332
p.87

Mention Umm Ayman (=Barakah), a client (slave-girl) of the
prophet. al-Tabari vol.39 p.287

In general, Abu Dawud vol.3 no.4443-4445 p.1244 teaches that
having sex with a slave-girl a man owns is OK.

But, having sex with a wife’s slave girl is OK if the wife made
her lawful for him. Note that he did not have to be married to the
slave girl. Ibn-i-Majah vol.4 no.2551 p.12

Mohammed “had intercourse with her [Mary] by virtue of her being
his property.” al-Tabari vol.39, p194. Footnote 845 explains, “That
is, Mariyah was ordered to veil herself as did the Prophet’s wives,
but he did not marry her.”

CONCLUSION

Muhammad’s unprovoked, murderous attacks of Jewish tribes
described above are acts of utter barbarity. His extermination and
genocide of the whole community, such as that of Banu Qurayza, makes
it worse.

His institution of slavery as a divine order of society was one
of the worst curse that could happen to humanity. Allowing sex
with slave-girls made it worse. His trading of slaves, such as selling
some Banu Qurayza captives in Nejd, was another evil institution.

Muhammad engaged in all these cruel, dehumanizing and horrible acts  with the divine sanctions of Allah. Muhammad and his brainchild
Allah were the worst evils to befall humankind, the detriment of
which continues to afflict humanity with no end in site.

Leave a Comment » | Cruel Peace Activists, Khaibar, Land for Peace | Permalink
Posted by Noah Simon


Anti-Semitism in Muslim lands

August 29, 2010

MUSTAFA OZER / AFP / GEDDY IMAGES

One of the 2002 Bali bombers, Amrozi bin Nurhasin, on trial in an Indonesian courtroom and headed toward execution, shouted out the message he wanted his crime to convey: “Jews: Remember Khaibar. The army of Muhammad is coming back to defeat you.”
This was his explanation of the murder of 202 people eight years ago. Of those who died, 88 were Australians, 38 Indonesians, 24 British. None were Jews. So what was Amrozi, a Java-born Indonesian, raving about? It’s a question worth considering as we assess the recent arrests for terrorist conspiracy in Ottawa. Islamic terrorists can finds motives in ancient struggles the rest of the world long ago forgot.
Martin Gilbert, the author of some 80 books, including the official biography of Winston Churchill, explains Amrozi’s meaning at the start of his alarming chronicle, In Ishmael’s House: A History of Jews in Muslim Lands, published this week.
Amrozi was remembering an event 1,375 years in the past, when Muhammad attacked Jewish farmers living in the oasis community of Khaibar, in what is now Saudi Arabia. More than 600 Jews were killed and the survivors lost all their property and had to pledge half of their future crops to Muhammad.
Today, few Jews know the word Khaibar. But among certain Muslims it has permanent resonance. Khaibar set a precedent, endorsed by the actions of the Prophet. After Khaibar, non-Muslims who were conquered had to give up their property and pay heavy permanent tribute to their Muslim overseers. That form of discrimination lasted for centuries. It was this incident and its aftermath that nourished Amrozi’s homicidal ambition.
Muslims love to recall that Jews once lived in peace among them. Of course, Jews were always second-class citizens, their rights sharply limited. Still, it was sometimes better than settling among Christians. Bernard Lewis, a major authority on Islam, says that Jewish lives under Islam were never as bad as in Christendom at its worst, or as good as in Christendom at its best.
In the 20th century, Arab hostility to Jews took an ugly turn. Some claim that the new state of Israel “caused” the trouble. But well before Israel’s creation in 1948, Arabs were identifying Jews as enemies.
In 1910, in the now-Iranian city of Shiraz, mobs robbed and destroyed 5,000 Jewish homes, with the encouragement of soldiers. In 1922, in Yemen, an old decree permitting the forcible conversion of Jewish orphans to Islam was reintroduced. The government searched towns and villages for children without fathers, so that they could be given Muslim instruction. The children were chained and imprisoned till they agreed to convert. In 1936 in Iraq, under Nazi influence, Jews were limited by quota in the public schools, Hebrew teaching was banned in Jewish schools and Jewish newspapers were shut down.
Anti-Semitism intensified when Israel was created, and grew still worse after Israel won the Six-Day War of 1967. By the 1970s, about 800,000 Jews, perhaps more, had been forcibly exiled from Arab countries, their property seized. According to the World Organization of Jews from Arab Countries (WOJAC), they lost property now valued at well over $100-billion.
A majority of these exiles settled in Israel. In the 1950s, the UN recognized them as refugees and compensation was discussed. Later, the Arab states turned the UN against Israel and, by association, against Jewish refugees. In 1975, the General Assembly condemned Zionism as “racism and racial discrimination.” Various political leaders in the West (notably Irwin Cotler, the former justice minister of Canada) have continued to argue for compensation. But after the 1975 resolution, as Gilbert notes, that idea was unlikely to receive any UN support.
The number of Jews displaced by the Arabs in the 20th century roughly equals the number of Palestinians displaced by Israel. But the plight of the Palestinians has received several hundred times as much publicity. One reason is the constant propaganda from Muslim states and their admirers in the West. Another is that many Jews, unlike Palestinians, don’t want to be called refugees.
Gilbert quotes an Iraqi Jew, Eli Timan, living in London: “The difference is that we got on with our life, worked hard and progressed so that today there is not a single Jewish refugee from Arab lands.” Those who suggest that this model be copied elsewhere will of course be condemned as heartless bigots.
National Post
robert.fulford@utoronto.ca

…and what was that about Hitler having Moroccan DNA?

noahdavidsimon’s posterous

Leave a Comment » | Khaibar | Permalink
Posted by Noah Simon


Egypt Opens Border to Gaza and Turkey threatens warships against Israel

June 2, 2010


Maybe I don’t speak for everyone in Dearborn. But those people gotten up to demonstrate at City Hall today don’t speak for me.
I haven’t felt much like blogging lately. But someone in Dearborn has to provide some outlet for the facts of what happened to the “humanitarian” flotilla that was trying to break the blockade on Gaza. The local news is not doing it.
Steve Emerson has written this:

Violence and Humanitarian Aid
IPT News
June 1, 2010

Condemnations of Israel’s commando raid on the flotilla trying to break a blockade on Gaza are pouring in after 10 people were reported killed in the violence at sea early Monday.
Egypt announced Tuesday that it would open its border with Gaza, which Reuters describes as “a major boost for Hamas and a blow to efforts by Israel and its Western allies to cripple the Islamists.” Turkey is threatening to send more ships, escorted by its own navy, while there are fears Hizballah will use the incident to justify a new wave of rocket attacks toward Israel.
Was it, as some suggest, the plan of flotilla organizers all along?
It’s worth remembering why the aid was being transported by sea in the first place. A convoy led by then-British MP George Galloway ended in violence at the Egyptian-Gaza border in early January after authorities delayed their entry into Gaza.
An Egyptian police officer was shot and killed by Hamas gunmen. Egypt deported Galloway, made it clear he was unwelcome there again, and told the convoy it could no longer enter through its crossing. Galloway’s partner in that convoy was the Turkish-based International Humanitarian Relief Foundation (IHH), which helped lead the flotilla.
IHH was a key player in the Free Gaza Movement flotilla. Israeli officials say IHH is tied to Hamas, and even to al Qaeda, and it was banned in Israel in 2008 for being “part of Hamas’s fundraising network.” Court papers in the U.S. prosecution of Abdurahman Alamoudi also tie it to terrorist activity, citing French intelligence expert Jean Louis-Bruguiere’s assessment that IHH played “[a]n important role” in the Millennium bomb plot.
IHH also is part of the Union of Good, a collection of charities run by Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi. The union was designated by the U.S. Treasury Department in 2008 as a terrorist entity due to its fund-raising activities on behalf of Hamas and Hamas-controlled organizations in the West Bank and Gaza.
During the past year, the Investigative Project on Terrorism has chronicled the Hamas-ties of relief convoy participants, led by Galloway. In March 2009, he defiantly handed a bag of cash directly to a Hamas minister and announced that:

“By Allah, we carried a lot of cash here. You thought we were all fat. We are not fat. This is money that we have around our waists … We are giving you now 100 vehicles and all of the contents. And we make no apology for what I am about to say: We are giving them to the elected government of Palestine; to the Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh.”

After the January convoy, a Palestinian media outlet reported that Hamas political and militant leaders were fighting for control of $1 million delivered in the Viva Palestina/IHH convoy. And last week, before the confrontation on the Mediterranean, Palestinian political scientist Talal Okal told the Christian Science Monitor that Hamas controls anything that comes in from the relief efforts. Hamas activists were even seen driving ambulances the convoy left behind:

“They want to show that they dominate everything, and that everything in Gaza passes under their eyes. So, if these boats arrive, Hamas will receive it [the aid] and distribute it how they want, to their supporters and according to their policies.”

With that in mind, Israel’s concern that the flotilla might carry goods Hamas could use in weapons and explosives isn’t so far-fetched.
In Monday’s violence, the videos speak for themselves. Israeli commandos were beaten as they landed on the ship’s deck by men wielding pipes, knives and other weapons. One commando said he thought the crowd was trying to lynch him. Israeli officials say the initial plan was to use paintball guns to gain control of the ship and that the navy team had handguns for use only if their lives were threatened.
Flotilla members grabbed at least one gun from a soldier, contributing to the decision to fire back, Israeli military officials said.
The Israelis, it seems, weren’t prepared for what met them. But any notion that the ship carried peaceful activists is ludicrous. They wanted a confrontation.
According to London’s Times, a flotilla passenger told a reporter during a stop in Cyprus:

“We are now waiting for one of two good things — either to reach Gaza or achieve martyrdom.”

She was not alone.
Al-Aqsa television, the Hamas station in Gaza, interviewed Professor Abd Al-Fatah Nu’man last week. According to a translation from the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), Nu’man said:

“Yesterday, the commander of the fleet said: ‘We will not allow the Zionists to come near us, and we will wage resistance against them.’ With what will they wage resistance? With their fingernails. These are people who wish to be martyred for the sake of Allah. As much as they want to reach Gaza, the other option is more desirable to them.”

As it turns out, they had much more than their fingernails. Clubs, knives and slingshots are among the weapons found on the ship and seen on the video in attacks on the commandos.
It’s clear, though, that the commandos were not the ones looking to hurt people. The Times report indicates passengers on five other ships in the flotilla were trained in non-violent resistance.
Israeli forces took control of those ships without reports of any injuries. They were taken to the Israeli port at Ashdod where officials pledged genuine humanitarian supplies will go to Gaza’s civilians.
That’s what officials said would happen when they urged the flotilla to give up peacefully:

“Delivery of the supplies, in accordance with the authority’s regulations will be through the formal land crossings and under your observation, after which, you can return to your home ports aboard the vessels on which you arrived.”

Contrast that with the message flotilla participants conveyed from the beginning. Passengers chanted “Khaibar, Khaibar ya Yahud Jaysh Muhammed Safayood” (Khaibar, Khaibar, oh Jews! The army of Muhammad will return!”)
That’s a taunt invoking a massacre of Jews.
Der Spiegel writer Christoph Schult thought the Israelis over-reacted, but recognized the passengers were spoiling for a fight:

“But as the Israeli army stormed the largest ship, the Mavi Marmara, the activists they encountered were in no way exclusively docile peaceniks. Some of the ‘peace activists’ received the Israelis with crow bars and sling shots. Some of the self-professed “human rights activists” reportedly even tore the weapons from soldiers and began to shoot.
That’s not what a peaceful protest looks like.”

Even Israelis and their supporters are openly wondering whether the country fell into a trap – designed to provoke Israel into action that cost it more in international pressure than in upholding its blockade of Hamas in Gaza.
Lost in all of this is the reason there is a blockade on Gaza at all. When Israel ended the occupation of Gaza by unilaterally withdrawing – even removing its own citizens by force – Hamas responded with increased terror attacks and launching thousands of crude rockets at Israeli civilians. It also kidnapped an Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, and has refused to hand him back after four years.
Newsweek’s Joe Klein, a frequent critic of Israeli policy, noted the underlying causes in a column about the flotilla attack:

“And the blockade is not total–food and humanitarian supplies are allowed through by the Israelis, which renders the humanitarian aspects of the flotilla redundant. The real purpose of the flotilla is to dramatize the inhuman conditions in Gaza. But those conditions are as attributable to Hamas’s behavior, especially its refusal to release Shalit and to negotiate, as they are to Israel’s intransigence. If I were an Israeli–even an Israel opponent of the Netanyahu coalition–I would be utterly opposed to making concessions to an organization as historically intransigent and violent as Hamas, unless there were signs that Hamas was willing to behave more reasonably.”

For all those who say they want life to improve for Palestinians in Gaza, they can do things to end the blockade and enhance the quality of life. But it begins with Hamas leadership and their belief, perhaps a correct one, that they are winning the propaganda war by preserving the status quo. Until that changes, conditions will not improve for Palestinians in Gaza.
What flotilla organizers call the legitimate government in Gaza is a murderous band of religious fanatics who seek no compromise, no peace that recognizes the state of Israel and calls for its destruction. Monday’s violence will only entrench their hard line.

Posted via web from noahdavidsimon’s posterous

Leave a Comment » | Flotilla, George Galloway, IHH, International Humanitarian Relief Foundation, Khaibar, Yusuf al-Qaradawi | Permalink
Posted by Noah Simon