Political Correction was the creation of gay thinkers who supported totalitarian fascists

December 21, 2013

I know I’m going to be called a homophobe, but the feminist CamillePaglia agrees with me. the liberals use Hitler’s philosopher to justify censorship for those who oppose gay marriage… and they use a gay French philosopher (Foucault) who enabled Shia Islam. The basic idea is that truth needs to be revealed through meaning and that the sum of the parts (penis and vagina) don’t give the final meaning because of sheer will.

PC and cultural relativism are the godchildren of Martin Heidegger and Michel Foucault, the philosopher apologists, respectively, for those most totalitarian of leaders (and great supporters of homosexuality… yeah, right) Adolph Hitler and the Ayatollah Khomeini. I know this flies over the heads of A&E executives who are unlikely to have read much, if any, Heidegger or Foucault, or know anything of the philosophers’ relationships to those dictators, but they should know how their minds have been manipulated, because what they have done is outrageous and reactionary.

Heidegger‘s Opinion on Gay Marriage

….Heidegger‘s notion of “worldhood.” What is so compelling is the idea that, as humans (as what Heidegger calls Dasein), we do not live in a world where we start with bare facts and then build meaning from them. We do not construct our world from the flotsam of objects, whether those objects be rocks and trees, tools and buildings, or even words and ideas. Rather, we live first and foremost in meaning, inside of meaning. A world is not a geographical locale or a collection of people and things. It is rather that within which our actions can have meaning… 

Whatever… nonsense… Hitler’s philosopher. Meaning becomes detached from reality …so the reality Martin Heidegger ignores because the meaning is hidden… therefor we blind ourselves of anything that offends us? …Fascists


Marriage Equality: Federal Judge Strikes Down Polygamy Ban Based on Gay Rights

December 16, 2013

(CBS) Advocacy groups for polygamy and individual liberties on Saturday hailed a federal judge’s ruling that key parts of Utah’s polygamy laws are unconstitutional, saying it will remove the threat of arrest for those families.
U.S. District Judge Clark Waddoups said in the decision handed down Friday that a provision in Utah law forbidding cohabitation with another person violated the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees basic rights, including freedom of religion.

(Knish) If we’re not going to have any standards for marriage except “People in a relationship of some kind” then there’s no reason not to recognize polygamy. Or any of the crazier stuff coming down the pike. And that was why the left pushed the gay marriage scam to begin with.
The legalization of polygamy followed logically from the legal arguments against one man-one woman, as was predicted not just by me, but also by Professor Martha Nussbaum, one of the leading legal advocates for gay marriage, “Polygamy would have to be permitted.”
A U.S. District Court judge has sided with the polgyamous Brown family, ruling that key parts of Utah’s polygamy laws are unconstitutional.
Judge Clark Waddoups’ 91-page ruling, issued Friday, sets a new legal precedent in Utah, effectively decriminalizing polygamy.
(KnishAnd the argument for striking down a polygamy ban? Modernity. Of course. We’re all so modern now that we know marriage is no longer between a man and a woman. It can be between anything and anything. A man and a man. A man and three women. A man and a tree.
“To state the obvious,” Judge Waddoups wrote, “the intervening years have witnessed a significant strengthening of numerous provisions of the Bill of Rights.” They include, he wrote, enhancements of the right to privacy and a shift in the Supreme Court’s posture “that is less inclined to allow majoritarian coercion of unpopular or disliked minority groups,” especially when “religious prejudice,” racism or “some other constitutionally suspect motivation can be discovered behind such legislation.”
The judge cited the decision in Lawrence v. Texas, the 2003 Supreme Court case that struck down laws prohibiting sodomy. He quoted the majority opinion by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy that stated the Constitution protects people from “unwarranted government intrusions into a dwelling or other private places” and “an autonomy of self that includes freedom of thought, belief, expression and certain intimate conduct.”
As same-sex marriage has gained popular approval and legal status in recent years, some have hoped — and some feared — that other forms of cohabitation might follow. Justice Antonin Scalia, in his bitter and famous dissent from the 2003 Lawrence case, said the nation was on the verge of the end of legislation based on morality, and was opening the door to legalizing “bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality and obscenity.”

Just like Cass Sunstein and Samantha Power wanted


NY Gay Marriage Bill rejected

December 2, 2009

Carbonated Union

May 27, 2009

related posts http://simonstudiotheatre.blogspot.com/search/label/Gay-Marriage

Is this Soda or Pop?:
Mr. Spot, Do you take this beverage?


/*Images are wrapped in divs classed “flickr_badge_image” with ids “flickr_badge_imageX” where “X” is an integer specifying ordinal position. Below are some styles to get you started!*/#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper {text-align:center; width:260px;}#flickr_badge_wrapper {padding:10px 0 10px 0;}.flickr_badge_image {margin:0 10px 10px 10px;}.flickr_badge_image img {border: 1px solid black !important;}#flickr_badge_source {text-align:left; margin:0 10px 0 10px;}#flickr_badge_icon {float:left; margin-right:5px;}#flickr_www {display:block; padding:0 10px 0 10px !important; font: 11px Arial, Helvetica, Sans serif !important; color:#3993ff !important;}#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:hover,#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:link,#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:active,#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:visited {text-decoration:none !important; background:inherit !important;color:#3993ff;}#flickr_badge_wrapper {}#flickr_badge_source {padding:0 !important; font: 11px Arial, Helvetica, Sans serif !important; color:#666666 !important;}


Nipple Twisting

May 17, 2009

you making child payments yet? know any gays that knocked up their wives? WAKE UP. it isn’t constitutional. infidelity is a breach of contract. gay marriage is nothing but punitive anger. I’d sooner be skeptical of w4 tax forms then a marriage contract… and yet marriage is what the online tyrants are snarky about. a voting Democracy is right on this one. not one election won by the beauty pageant bullies. sadly the gay community will eventually understand that they need their own contracts to protect their own needs. till that time we will protect society from arbitrary abuse of the left. the Prop8 protesters are more hypocritical then a San Francisco politician on a Gitmo briefing. aren’t honest about the nipple twisting that you knew about? well you can troll online because if you go public people will tear you a second asshole like Nancy Pilosi. Gay Marriage just isn’t transparent. we need honesty. not lies. in related news: “‘Gay’ gene claim suddenly vanishes ” no inherantly “Gay” people according to the American Psychological Association http://ff.im/2RAgp woman like PreJean get ahead without controversy. it was admirable of her. we live in a dangerous culture of parasites playing at slippery slopes. everything is debatable. Israel is just one argument away from over. people should be snarky at other documents besides marriage. marriage protects people because it reflects their relationship. it is transparent because it is reflective. true transparency reflects at certain angles and allows you to see through it at others. men have to pay child support. women can get pregnant. this is something the government needs to address. you can not grant rights by taking authentic dignity away. PreJean might not understand this and takes her opinions on faith (which I respect)… but there are very good reasons why religion is against “Gay Marriage”. We have become so sarcastic as a society that we have forgotten to analyze what institution the angry pitchfork mobs are attempting to tear down.

/*Images are wrapped in divs classed “flickr_badge_image” with ids “flickr_badge_imageX” where “X” is an integer specifying ordinal position. Below are some styles to get you started!*/#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper {text-align:center; width:260px;}#flickr_badge_wrapper {padding:10px 0 10px 0;}.flickr_badge_image {margin:0 10px 10px 10px;}.flickr_badge_image img {border: 1px solid black !important;}#flickr_badge_source {text-align:left; margin:0 10px 0 10px;}#flickr_badge_icon {float:left; margin-right:5px;}#flickr_www {display:block; padding:0 10px 0 10px !important; font: 11px Arial, Helvetica, Sans serif !important; color:#3993ff !important;}#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:hover,#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:link,#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:active,#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:visited {text-decoration:none !important; background:inherit !important;color:#3993ff;}#flickr_badge_wrapper {}#flickr_badge_source {padding:0 !important; font: 11px Arial, Helvetica, Sans serif !important; color:#666666 !important;}


Nipple Twisting

May 17, 2009

you making child payments yet? know any gays that knocked up their wives? WAKE UP. it isn’t constitutional. infidelity is a breach of contract. gay marriage is nothing but punitive anger. I’d sooner be skeptical of w4 tax forms then a marriage contract… and yet marriage is what the online tyrants are snarky about. a voting Democracy is right on this one. not one election won by the beauty pageant bullies. sadly the gay community will eventually understand that they need their own contracts to protect their own needs. till that time we will protect society from arbitrary abuse of the left. the Prop8 protesters are more hypocritical then a San Francisco politician on a Gitmo briefing. aren’t honest about the nipple twisting that you knew about? well you can troll online because if you go public people will tear you a second asshole like Nancy Pilosi. Gay Marriage just isn’t transparent. we need honesty. not lies. in related news: “‘Gay’ gene claim suddenly vanishes ” no inherantly “Gay” people according to the American Psychological Association http://ff.im/2RAgp woman like PreJean get ahead without controversy. it was admirable of her. we live in a dangerous culture of parasites playing at slippery slopes. everything is debatable. Israel is just one argument away from over. people should be snarky at other documents besides marriage. marriage protects people because it reflects their relationship. it is transparent because it is reflective. true transparency reflects at certain angles and allows you to see through it at others. men have to pay child support. women can get pregnant. this is something the government needs to address. you can not grant rights by taking authentic dignity away. PreJean might not understand this and takes her opinions on faith (which I respect)… but there are very good reasons why religion is against “Gay Marriage”. We have become so sarcastic as a society that we have forgotten to analyze what institution the angry pitchfork mobs are attempting to tear down.

/*Images are wrapped in divs classed “flickr_badge_image” with ids “flickr_badge_imageX” where “X” is an integer specifying ordinal position. Below are some styles to get you started!*/#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper {text-align:center; width:260px;}#flickr_badge_wrapper {padding:10px 0 10px 0;}.flickr_badge_image {margin:0 10px 10px 10px;}.flickr_badge_image img {border: 1px solid black !important;}#flickr_badge_source {text-align:left; margin:0 10px 0 10px;}#flickr_badge_icon {float:left; margin-right:5px;}#flickr_www {display:block; padding:0 10px 0 10px !important; font: 11px Arial, Helvetica, Sans serif !important; color:#3993ff !important;}#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:hover,#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:link,#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:active,#flickr_badge_uber_wrapper a:visited {text-decoration:none !important; background:inherit !important;color:#3993ff;}#flickr_badge_wrapper {}#flickr_badge_source {padding:0 !important; font: 11px Arial, Helvetica, Sans serif !important; color:#666666 !important;}


Boycott Melissa Etheridge

April 12, 2009