Sexual Jihad

July 13, 2013

That explains everything:

A fatwa (religious edict) apparently permitting ‘sexual jihad’ appeared on a Facebook page reportedly affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), but some have dismissed it as a parody.

The fatwa supposedly came in response to a question by a female Brotherhood supporter asking if ‘sexual Jihad’ is allowed in Rabea al-Adawiya Square and other squares in Egypt where people have been protesting against Mohammed Mursi’s ouster since June 30.

The religious answer appearing on the Facebook page was: “Not now. Let us wait first for what will happen, may God strengthen the Mujahedeen.”

“Sexual Jihad” refers to the idea of the female Islamists offering their sexual services to their male counterparts so they remain motivated to continue the struggle for their cause.

Now, at least, I know the reason why all kinds of protest in this here country and in general in the West are so lukewarm: no activists of that Brotherhood lady type volunteering. No motivation, you see.

(get these guys laid, no problem I guess)

‘Palestinian’ prisoners’ wives to be artificially inseminated? | #Sperm #SpermJihad

April 25, 2013

The ‘Palestinians’ fatwa council has approved the artificial insemination of the wives of ‘Palestinians’ in Israeli prisons. Yes, of course, only with the terrorist husbands’ sperm.

The Razan Medical Center for Infertility, which has clinics in Ramallah and Nablus, has offered free insemination treatment to the wives of political prisoners who manage to smuggle sperm out of Israeli jails.
In February, the clinic announced that four prisoners’ wives were pregnant as a result of artificial insemination.
The clinic’s director-general, Salim Abu al-Khayzaran, explained the insemination process to the Fatwa council, which issued a decision approving the treatment on Wednesday.
The council set over a dozen conditions to make the process religiously acceptable.
The couple must be married, and the pregnancy must be agreed by both partners and preferably their families, the council ruled. Several of the couple’s next-of-kin relatives must witness the insemination, and the process must be made public.
The council also ruled that artificial insemination must be the only possible option for pregnancy. It said the couple must have consummated their marriage, ruling out marriages entered into in prison, as unconsummated marriages are considered engagements.
It must be the prisoner’s first child to qualify as an emergency, and the detainee must be serving a long sentence which would prohibit childbearing upon his release. 

We’ve heard this claim before. But there’s just one small problem: Sperm cannot live outside the human body for more than an hour  and it must be kept in a sterile container.
Either the ‘Palestinians’ are able to smuggle semen out of Israeli prisons within an hour (where are the Israeli prison authorities?), or the ‘Palestinians’ have discovered the secret of immaculate conception, or this story is a lie in one of two ways.
I leave the intellectual exercise to figure out the two ways in which this story could be a lie to the reader .

give em pig sperm instead. they won’t notice the difference

Frog fatwa protects ‘croaking praise to Allah’

July 4, 2012
Frog fatwa protects 'croaking praise to Allah'(Plagues) of frogs (צְּפַרְדֵּעַ): Ex. 7:25–8:11

This is what the great LORD says: Let my people go, so that they may worship me. If you refuse to let them go, I will plague your whole country with frogs. The Nile will teem with frogs. They will come up into your palace and your bedroom and onto your bed, into the houses of your officials and on your people, and into your ovens and kneading troughs. The frogs will go up on you and your people and all your officials.
— Exodus 8:1–4
The second plague of Egypt was frogs. God commanded Moses to tell Aaron to stretch the staff over the water, and hordes of frogs came and overran Egypt. Pharaoh’s sorcerers were also able to duplicate this plague with their magic. However, since they were unable to remove it, Pharaoh was forced to grant permission for the Israelites to leave so that Moses would agree to remove the frogs. To prove that the plague was actually a divine punishment, Moses let Pharaoh choose the time that it would end. Pharaoh chose the following day, and all the frogs died the next day. Nevertheless, Pharaoh rescinded his permission, and the Israelites stayed in Egypt.
(Times247) Frogs in Egypt are now protected by a fatwa that forbids individuals from eating them. It’s the first fatwa to appear by Egypt’s highest fatwa council since the Muslim Brotherhood came to power. Photo Credit:Wikimedia Commons

Following the presidential victory of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Muhammad Morsi, the very first fatwa to appear by Egypt’s highest fatwa council addresses — not social, political, or economic issues in Egypt — but rather frogs.
As the fatwa explains, according to Islam’s prophet Muhammad as recorded in a hadith, a frog’s “croaking is praise [to Allah].”
Accordingly, “a number of jurists [fuqaha] have relied on this [hadith] to forbid the eating of frogs, under the notion that ‘that which is banned from being killed, is forbidden from being eaten.’ “

Octavia Nasr is Tweeting for Khader

February 26, 2012

(Comment Is Free Watch)Following the death of the Lebanese Grand Ayatollah Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, one of the original spiritual guides of Hezbollah, CNN senior Middle East affairs editor Octavia Nasr Tweeted the following.

Despite an attempt at an apology, Nasr was subsequently fired by the network, which released a statement noting that Nasr’s “credibility…as senior editor for Middle Eastern affairs has been compromised going forward.”  You think?!
Just to be clear, the Hezbollah leader Nasr was Tweeting support for was an unequivocal supporter of suicide bombing against Israeli civilians, issued a fatawa justifying the suicide bombing which attacked the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983, and was a Holocaust revisionist (MORE).

Fatwa against dogs and a solution. Hijab for your dog!

November 9, 2010
(UK) For a while now western nations have bent over backwards in which to accommodate the followers of Islam who happen to live within their borders. Anybody who objects to mosques,halal meat, Sharia law etc… is branded a racist and ostracised from decent society. One such example is how Manchester Airport in the north of England has set aside changing rooms for around 10,000 plus Muslims who they expect will undertake the Haj to Mecca. These changing rooms at Terminal One will enable these travellers to change into the simple white robes that Muslims clad themselves in while walking round Mecca. But the part which caught my eye is how spare robes will be made available for those travellers who feel that they have been contaminated by police dogs at the the airport. For years now all we have heard from protesting muslims is how they see our canine friends as unclean and that we have to respect their views by going nowhere near them with them.

the biggest rise in dog fighting in over 100 years had been reported in the UK, surprisingly the idiots behind this despicable (and forbidden) act are all Islamic. get that the very people who protest about being near dogs are the very ones keeping them at home. (Which may help explain why 18 month old Zumer Ahmed was ripped apart by her uncles pitbull in the family kitchen.) Well returning to Manchester it seems that Arshad Hussain has just been found guilty of mistreating 4 pitbull types he kept in a lock-up at the back of the house. When the RSPCA raided his premises they found all the dogs sporting injuries consistent with dog fighting , he claims that they had been fighting amongst themselves. Yup that old excuse.
In light of this growth of this underground Islamic led dog fighting scene, the question needs to be asked is why do we continue to pander to this notion that we must respect Muslims by going nowhere near them with dogs when it transpires that they have no problems at all with dogs. I mean it didn’t stop a number of Islamic idiots from trying to plant explosives inside a number of them the other-day in Iraq.

Muhammad, profit of Islam,
hated dogs too.
Every soldier of Allah
seeks to emulate Muhammad
because he was the perfect man,
uswa hasana, al insan al kamil……

(Reuters) – A senior Iranian cleric has decreed dogs are “unclean” and should not be kept as pets — a move aimed at discouraging Western-style dog ownership in the Islamic state, a newspaper reported on Saturday
Dogs are considered “unclean” under Islamic tradition but, while relatively rare in Iran, some people do keep them as pets.
By issuing a fatwa — a religious ruling — Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi has sent a clear message that this trend must stop.
“Friendship with dogs is a blind imitation of the West,” he was quoted as saying in Javan daily. “There are lots of people in the West who love their dogs more than their wives and children.”

Guard dogs and sheep dogs are considered acceptable under Islamic law but Iranians who carry dogs in their cars or take them to public parks can be stopped by police and fined.
The Koran does not explicitly prohibit contact with dogs, Shirazi said, but Islamic tradition showed it to be so. “We have lots of narrations in Islam that say dogs are unclean.”
The interpretation of religious rules on personal conduct is a constant source of debate and potential conflict in Iran which has been an Islamic republic since a revolution ousted the Western-backed Shah in 1979.
In a television interview last week, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad weighed in on the issue of the Islamic dress code, saying women who fail to cover their hair completely should not be harassed by the police.
Morality police are conducting their annual crackdown and women who reveal strands of hair are liable to be stopped in the streets for failing to respect the dress code, or “hijab.”
Ahmadinejad’s surprisingly liberal view was condemned by fellow hard-liner politicians and senior clerics “I wish he had not said those words about the hijab,” Grand Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati told the faithful during the week’s Friday prayers, in a rare criticism of the president.
“We are grappling with many problems including economic and political ones but the issues of morality and ethical security are among the important issues that cannot be ignored,” he said.
Tehran University has set up a thinktank “to investigate the problems related to hijab,” the representative of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to the university announced on Monday.

Fatwas and Flogging on Fake hymens in Egypt?

November 7, 2010

According to, a capsule is being sold in Arab communities in the Middle East – including in Israel – that is inserted vaginally before the wedding night. It then explodes, giving off a red dye that resembles blood, thus potentially saving the woman’s life, as well as her reputation.


…but why not get the surgery?   Real blood is better.  right?

DUBAI (Al Arabiya)

From new noses to luscious lips modern technology means anything can be bought, and now a Chinese-made “hymen” aims to give women back their virginity, which MPs in Egypt have slammed as a deceitful tool that promotes vice and corruption. The hymen, called the Virginity Hymen, consists of a tiny pouch that is inserted inside a womans vagina and contains a red substance, simulating blood, which leaks when the pouch is broken during sexual intercourse. The devise, which costs $15, has kicked off mass debates amongst Egypts MPs and religious scholars about ways to stop it from being imported to Egypt as they fear it may encourage promiscuous behavior. A fatwa sanctioning the harshest of punishments on those who import the hymen was issued by Dr. Abdel-Moati Bayoumi, a member of the Center for Islamic Research (CIR), which has been slammed as unnecessary. People who bring the artificial hymen into the country should be severely penalized, Bayoumi, who is also a former Deputy Chairman of the Religious Affairs Committee in parliament, stated in his fatwa. They spread vice and encourage girls to engage in illicit relationships as they know they can restore their virginity, he warned. Egyptian imam, Sheikh Youssef al-Badri, agreed with Bayoumi and argued that people who import the hymen should be made an example of to others so they dont think of getting involved in the same business. A person dealing with artificial hymens should be flogged, put in jail, or deported from the country so that no one else could think of following suit, he said. Meanwhile another CIR member, Sheikh Mahmoud Ashour, slammed Bayoumis fatwa as “ijtihad,” an independent interpretation of Islamic law in order to evaluate a contemporary issue. Instead of imposing penalties on importers of artificial hymens, we should declare it is religiously illicit to import it, sell it or distribute it, Ashour, who is also the former al-Azhar deputy chairman, told the London-based Asharq al-Awsat. We should also impose hefty fines on those import it, he added. Dr. Mustafa al-Shakaa, also a CIR member, said it was enough to apply the commercial fraud law on this new product. The artificial hymen involves deceit on the part of women, he told the paper. Thus importing it is fraudulent. Shakaa added that any decision concerning the artificial hymen should be preceded by meetings between Islamic scholars so they can reach a consensus on ways to deal with what he called a violation of Muslim honor. Despite the fuss about the product, there is still no proof it has reached the Egyptian market but rumor has it that it is already being used by some doctors in private clinics. Islam forbids fornication, or sex outside of marriage. In some traditional societies a woman’s virginity is linked with family honor and is, in fact, the main cause of the majority of honor killings

Cartoonist Molly Norris

September 17, 2010

…has gone into hiding on the advice of the FBI after receiving death threats from Islamic extremist Anwar al-Awlaki…

In April, Norris published a drawing of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, which is considered blasphemous by some Muslims.

The same cleric who issued fatwa for death of Seattle cartoonist has led #Muslim prayers for U.S. Congress staff.

When a report challenging our national security policy of ignoring Islamic supremacism through Islamic law was released during a Capitol Hill press conference on Wednesday (disclosure: I was one of the co-authors of the report, titled: “Shariah: The Threat to America”), among the chief critics were representatives from the Congressional Muslim Staffers Association (CMSA).
This group, which has been briefing both Democrat and Republican congressional leadership in recent months, claiming that there is nothing inherently violent in Islamic law, has a very poor history of embracing Islamic radicals — even al-Qaeda terrorists.
Immediately after 9/11, the CMSA began holding Friday afternoon prayer services on Capitol Hill. Who did they choose to lead them in their prayers? Al-Qaeda sheikh Anwar al-Awlaki, who is currently subject to a kill or capture order issued by President Obama. In fact, video of al-Awlaki preaching to the CMSA was included in the 2002 documentary, Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet. (That video clip is available to view via the Investigative Project on Terrorism.)