Are these Jews in Jerusalem in 1948 the occupier?

November 30, 2009
Looting of the Jewish Jerusalem, John Phillips. Jume 1948
Looting in burning Jerusalem, John Phillips. June 1948
An Israeli NGO has sent a letter to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton threatening a class action lawsuit if she continues to call Jewish cities and towns in Judea and Samaria ‘illegal settlements.’ The letter, which was also sent to Prime Minister Netanyahu, argues that the ‘settlement freeze’ is illegal under a 1924 treaty in which the United States recognized that Judea and Samaria were part of the British Mandate for ‘Palestine.’ The Office for Israeli Constitutional Law, a non-governmental legal action organization, sent a letter to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last week, warning that by labeling Jewish settlements in the West Bank illegal, she is violating international law via israelmatzav.blogspot.com“The little-known Anglo-American Convention, a treaty signed by the US and British governments in 1924, stipulated that the US fully accepted upon itself the Mandate for Palestine, which declared all of the West Bank within its borders.”

Jewish girl, Rachel Levy, 7, fleeing from street w. burning bldgs. as the Arabs sack Jerusalem after its surrender. May 28, 1948. John Phillips
Jewish girl, Rachel Levy, 7, fleeing from street w. burning bldgs. as the Arabs sack Jerusalem after its surrender. May 28, 1948. John Phillips
1948israel3
Jewish families leaving the old city through Zion’s Gate. June 1948. John Phillips
Jewish people attempting to leave portion of city surrendered to Arab forces. Jerusalem, Israel. June 1948. John Phillips
Jewish people attempting to leave portion of city surrendered to Arab forces. Jerusalem, Israel. June 1948. John Phillips http://xrl.us/1948jerusalem UPDATE Bibi has agreed to freeze housing building in Jerusalem and Samaria, but the agreement did not include Jerusalem. Obama and his administration are complaining anyway.


Are these Jews in Jerusalem in 1948 the occupier?

November 30, 2009


Looting of the Jewish Jerusalem, John Phillips. Jume 1948Looting in burning Jerusalem, John Phillips. June 1948

An Israeli NGO has sent a letter to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton threatening a class action lawsuit if she continues to call Jewish cities and towns in Judea and Samaria ‘illegal settlements.’ The letter, which was also sent to Prime Minister Netanyahu, argues that the ‘settlement freeze’ is illegal under a 1924 treaty in which the United States recognized that Judea and Samaria were part of the British Mandate for ‘Palestine.’

The Office for Israeli Constitutional Law, a non-governmental legal action organization, sent a letter to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last week, warning that by labeling Jewish settlements in the West Bank illegal, she is violating international law
via
israelmatzav.blogspot.com

“The little-known Anglo-American Convention, a treaty signed by the US and British governments in 1924, stipulated that the US fully accepted upon itself the Mandate for Palestine, which declared all of the West Bank within its borders.”
Jewish girl, Rachel Levy, 7, fleeing from street w. burning bldgs. as the Arabs sack Jerusalem after its surrender. May 28, 1948. John Phillips
Jewish girl, Rachel Levy, 7, fleeing from street w. burning bldgs. as the Arabs sack Jerusalem after its surrender. May 28, 1948. John Phillips
1948israel3
Jewish families leaving the old city through Zion’s Gate. June 1948. John Phillips
Jewish people attempting to leave portion of city surrendered to Arab forces. Jerusalem, Israel. June 1948. John Phillips
Jewish people attempting to leave portion of city surrendered to Arab forces. Jerusalem, Israel. June 1948. John Phillips


Ethnic Cleansing

June 9, 2009

the gun pointed to my head from scripture reflecting the present is very different then scripture that reflect an altered reality. people that attempt to follow violence… will act according to the wording. fundamental hostility would be hostility of the moment. using a blanket argument of religious universal hostility, one could summarize that anyone who disagrees and feels a bitter end will be the result is violent. these arguments are proven conjecture. Islam’s nature is self evident from it’s writing. in some slippery slope everyone feels that the errors of humans around them will lead to their demise. the beauty of Western thought is that it creates a safety device. the present situation is not the axioms of finality. Islam does not have this institution. in fact Islam repeatedly reminds it’s followers that if they are not committing aggression that the messiah will not come. the burden is on Islam to fight. it is an irony that the safety device in Western thinking that protects our culture from acting erratically is the fixation of terrorist sympathetic arguments. the end of time can not be brought on pro-actively in Judeo-Christianity.

http://new.seesmic.com/threads/ycei3AXIVS

“The agreement with the administration was publicly announced in May 2004 by then president George W. Bush at the White House following his meeting with Sharon and published in a public letter from Bush to Sharon. Bush’s letter recognized that Israel would not return to the 1949 armistice lines and that major communities and blocs of settlements in areas within its domestic consensus like the Adumim bloc, the Ariel bloc and the Etzion bloc would remain under Israeli control in perpetuity. The same is true for areas like the Jordan Valley which are essential for ensuring that our borders are defensible. Sharon upheld the Bush letter as an “unprecedented achievement” in a speech before the Knesset. And he, his chief of staff Dov Weisglass, Livni, and Ehud Olmert all presented it as the payoff for leaving Gaza.”

even CNN has the Bush/Sharon letters that contradict the Obama administration and Clinton
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/14/bush.letter/


Ethnic Cleansing

June 9, 2009

the gun pointed to my head from scripture reflecting the present is very different then scripture that reflect an altered reality. people that attempt to follow violence… will act according to the wording. fundamental hostility would be hostility of the moment. using a blanket argument of religious universal hostility, one could summarize that anyone who disagrees and feels a bitter end will be the result is violent. these arguments are proven conjecture. Islam’s nature is self evident from it’s writing. in some slippery slope everyone feels that the errors of humans around them will lead to their demise. the beauty of Western thought is that it creates a safety device. the present situation is not the axioms of finality. Islam does not have this institution. in fact Islam repeatedly reminds it’s followers that if they are not committing aggression that the messiah will not come. the burden is on Islam to fight. it is an irony that the safety device in Western thinking that protects our culture from acting erratically is the fixation of terrorist sympathetic arguments. the end of time can not be brought on pro-actively in Judeo-Christianity.

http://new.seesmic.com/threads/ycei3AXIVS

“The agreement with the administration was publicly announced in May 2004 by then president George W. Bush at the White House following his meeting with Sharon and published in a public letter from Bush to Sharon. Bush’s letter recognized that Israel would not return to the 1949 armistice lines and that major communities and blocs of settlements in areas within its domestic consensus like the Adumim bloc, the Ariel bloc and the Etzion bloc would remain under Israeli control in perpetuity. The same is true for areas like the Jordan Valley which are essential for ensuring that our borders are defensible. Sharon upheld the Bush letter as an “unprecedented achievement” in a speech before the Knesset. And he, his chief of staff Dov Weisglass, Livni, and Ehud Olmert all presented it as the payoff for leaving Gaza.”

even CNN has the Bush/Sharon letters that contradict the Obama administration and Clinton
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/14/bush.letter/