innocent bystanders hurt by aMANdaChapel and PurpleCar

July 15, 2008

innocent bystanders had accounts deleted last night on twitter as @Jack responded to twitter whores @aMANdaChapel and @PurpleCar


innocent bystanders hurt by aMANdaChapel and PurpleCar

July 15, 2008

innocent bystanders had accounts deleted last night on twitter as @Jack responded to twitter whores @aMANdaChapel and @PurpleCar


@PurpleCar is the real lie

May 4, 2008

@PurpleCar seems to think of herself as an impartial moderator, when she herself is part of the eMOM tyranny. She asked me to turn off @panopticons. She also said she couldn’t contact me on twitter because I unfollowed her when the fact is that she unfollowed me first. Talk about a Jimmy Carter Impartial! When I pointed out that 1 out of three of the troops (according to RAND) have serious mental health issues she pointed out that she was a psychoanalyst (she might be lying). How many of ‘YALL want psychotherapists talking to the troops without military supervision? Haven’t we learned enough about the industry of psychoanalysis to realize that shrinks unsupervised are a very bad thing?
NO ONE SHOULD BE TALKING TO THE TROOPS ON TWITTER… and especially not those who are solicited in the eMOM @MailOurMilitary community. I have been following the crowd for months and they are brash arrogant, reckless and dangerous. (a lot like the member of the psychoanalytic community and their drug pushing) The people they solicit to talk to soldiers are generally against the war in Iraq. This is not public health. This is a tyranny.


click for more on the issue of @Panopticons and

If your reading this @PurpleCar!
color wars are one thing… (funny yeah sure. People on TWITTER are lemmings. ha ha self referential joke!), but eMOM @MailOurMilitary takes a “one of us/high school society” too far.

The most frustrating thing for me of course is I treated this whore of a woman as a friend. @PurpleCar is very coy. I don’t know what her intentions are, but her game is caustic. I think she likes to toy with men she doesn’t know. I tried to be nice to her because she went to University of Pittsburgh when I was at Carnegie Mellon. I tried telling her how messed up the academic climate is in that city. She seemed to find that as some kind of fuel to toy with. I tried to be honest with her… but I think I might of opened up to a person that carries a lot of baggage and I should not of consulted with her. She is not fit to be a counselor and I shudder to think that she is attempting to act as such with the troops. I talked to her the night my brother got attacked in our family car by the mysterious White Truck. I believe she unfollowed because she didn’t want to be involved, but to have the pretension of friendship means you care about your friends. I’m on TWITTER to begin with because I was tired of the social networking idea of friends. People with four thousand plus of them… and they say the are impartial and don’t have opinions, but the truth is these people are not friends. I created @panopticons to combat not only @MailOurMilitary, but the other forced social element of social networking. @panopticons is not the monster. It is people like @PurpleCar who are the real monster.

The end result of this whole travesty is it kept me from doing my work, but I think it is a small price to pay considering the amount of damage she could be doing to soldiers.


@PurpleCar is the real lie

May 4, 2008

@PurpleCar seems to think of herself as an impartial moderator, when she herself is part of the eMOM tyranny. She asked me to turn off @panopticons. She also said she couldn’t contact me on twitter because I unfollowed her when the fact is that she unfollowed me first. Talk about a Jimmy Carter Impartial! When I pointed out that 1 out of three of the troops (according to RAND) have serious mental health issues she pointed out that she was a psychoanalyst (she might be lying). How many of ‘YALL want psychotherapists talking to the troops without military supervision? Haven’t we learned enough about the industry of psychoanalysis to realize that shrinks unsupervised are a very bad thing?
NO ONE SHOULD BE TALKING TO THE TROOPS ON TWITTER… and especially not those who are solicited in the eMOM @MailOurMilitary community. I have been following the crowd for months and they are brash arrogant, reckless and dangerous. (a lot like the member of the psychoanalytic community and their drug pushing) The people they solicit to talk to soldiers are generally against the war in Iraq. This is not public health. This is a tyranny.


click for more on the issue of @Panopticons and

If your reading this @PurpleCar!
color wars are one thing… (funny yeah sure. People on TWITTER are lemmings. ha ha self referential joke!), but eMOM @MailOurMilitary takes a “one of us/high school society” too far.

The most frustrating thing for me of course is I treated this whore of a woman as a friend. @PurpleCar is very coy. I don’t know what her intentions are, but her game is caustic. I think she likes to toy with men she doesn’t know. I tried to be nice to her because she went to University of Pittsburgh when I was at Carnegie Mellon. I tried telling her how messed up the academic climate is in that city. She seemed to find that as some kind of fuel to toy with. I tried to be honest with her… but I think I might of opened up to a person that carries a lot of baggage and I should not of consulted with her. She is not fit to be a counselor and I shudder to think that she is attempting to act as such with the troops. I talked to her the night my brother got attacked in our family car by the mysterious White Truck. I believe she unfollowed because she didn’t want to be involved, but to have the pretension of friendship means you care about your friends. I’m on TWITTER to begin with because I was tired of the social networking idea of friends. People with four thousand plus of them… and they say the are impartial and don’t have opinions, but the truth is these people are not friends. I created @panopticons to combat not only @MailOurMilitary, but the other forced social element of social networking. @panopticons is not the monster. It is people like @PurpleCar who are the real monster.

The end result of this whole travesty is it kept me from doing my work, but I think it is a small price to pay considering the amount of damage she could be doing to soldiers.


@AmandaChapel courting @MailOurMilitary

April 24, 2008

@AmandaChapel you courting the eMoms?
exactly what I was afraid of.
@MailOurMilitary circles around NAZI Transgendered freaks like @AmandaChapel

interesting.
I accuse a close association between eMom and
@amandachapel and she deletes all her tweets.
now we know there is something to hide


WHY TWITTER PEOPLE SHOULDN’T EMAIL THE TROOPS

April 18, 2008

hey Cindy Sheehan… I mean “This Military Mama”

Photobucket

MAIL OUR MILITARY DOES NOT MEAN WELL AND IS POLITICALLY MOTIVATED

This organization is making threats at me right now. should an enterprise that behaves like they do be responsible for talking to our troops or is there a caustic agenda here?

I’m dealing with you. That takes a talent. Respect what I offer in the same way that you should be respecting the troops. Brown shirts like you think the war is only dudes holding a gun. I live right near West Point and I know plenty of people fighting, but it doesn’t take geography or an occupation to put two and two together and realize that the community of twitter is very against the war and is not mature in it’s ideas related to it. I hear the personal stories on the train going up the Hudson. I hear about missiles coming out of Iran and kids not being able to write about what they saw with they’re very own eyes because our country doesn’t want to admit we are already at war with Iran. You are attacking me on a personal level because you know I am hitting a relevant point and it hurts the vanity of you and your friends. SHAME ON YOU FOR BEING SO SELFISH! You are trying to reflect by pointing out that I am not a soldier? Do you honestly believe the opinions of someone dodging bullets is going to be able to argue with you? Ah.. but I guess you do… that is why you are writing them isn’t it? If there is one thing we should of learned from Vietnam… it isn’t “diplomacy” that wins the fight, but rather the public relations and mind set of the people. Once the mind of the people is determined, then we can take part in diplomacy. But with the TWITTER society manipulating public opinion like it does, negotiations are going to look like Jimmy Carter’s shit smile with Hamas. I am in communications and I am trying to protect the dudes that do not have the extensive background I have. I honor them and respect them, but I am not the one holding a gun. Only tyrannical idiots with an agenda think the way you do “Military Mama”. In the same respect. I do not think I would be best at holding a gun, I also believe that dealing with hard nose jerks like you takes a specialist. I respect the soldiers too much to go out there with them. I would gladly give my life, but if a person with my background disagreed with a higher up… that would be a very bad thing. America doesn’t need a person like me second guessing the troops, but you guys need to get your shit straight if you are so arrogant to go and start communicating with soldiers without a second opinion on what would be prudent in filtering out bad twitter apples. The fact that you are attacking me with the venom that you are just proves your ill will. You act like this with a soldier and he’s liable to have a problem. You are not interested in helping the troops “Military Mama”. You are interested in you’re own vanity. What I bring to this is valid criticism of a program that could hurt our country.

the simple fact of the matter is the “Mail our Military” website does not adequately explain to people the screening and I am very suspicious of this. I assure you in the future I will speak as loudly and as strongly. The behavior of those involved in this operation is atrocious and was deserving of the critique. It is only the lives of people who fight for this country who are at stake, don’t they deserve a strong debate on how to support them or are we going to betray our military again?

more: Message to a TALL DUDE


WHY TWITTER PEOPLE SHOULDN’T EMAIL THE TROOPS

April 18, 2008

hey Cindy Sheehan… I mean “This Military Mama”

Photobucket

MAIL OUR MILITARY DOES NOT MEAN WELL AND IS POLITICALLY MOTIVATED

This organization is making threats at me right now. should an enterprise that behaves like they do be responsible for talking to our troops or is there a caustic agenda here?

I’m dealing with you. That takes a talent. Respect what I offer in the same way that you should be respecting the troops. Brown shirts like you think the war is only dudes holding a gun. I live right near West Point and I know plenty of people fighting, but it doesn’t take geography or an occupation to put two and two together and realize that the community of twitter is very against the war and is not mature in it’s ideas related to it. I hear the personal stories on the train going up the Hudson. I hear about missiles coming out of Iran and kids not being able to write about what they saw with they’re very own eyes because our country doesn’t want to admit we are already at war with Iran. You are attacking me on a personal level because you know I am hitting a relevant point and it hurts the vanity of you and your friends. SHAME ON YOU FOR BEING SO SELFISH! You are trying to reflect by pointing out that I am not a soldier? Do you honestly believe the opinions of someone dodging bullets is going to be able to argue with you? Ah.. but I guess you do… that is why you are writing them isn’t it? If there is one thing we should of learned from Vietnam… it isn’t “diplomacy” that wins the fight, but rather the public relations and mind set of the people. Once the mind of the people is determined, then we can take part in diplomacy. But with the TWITTER society manipulating public opinion like it does, negotiations are going to look like Jimmy Carter’s shit smile with Hamas. I am in communications and I am trying to protect the dudes that do not have the extensive background I have. I honor them and respect them, but I am not the one holding a gun. Only tyrannical idiots with an agenda think the way you do “Military Mama”. In the same respect. I do not think I would be best at holding a gun, I also believe that dealing with hard nose jerks like you takes a specialist. I respect the soldiers too much to go out there with them. I would gladly give my life, but if a person with my background disagreed with a higher up… that would be a very bad thing. America doesn’t need a person like me second guessing the troops, but you guys need to get your shit straight if you are so arrogant to go and start communicating with soldiers without a second opinion on what would be prudent in filtering out bad twitter apples. The fact that you are attacking me with the venom that you are just proves your ill will. You act like this with a soldier and he’s liable to have a problem. You are not interested in helping the troops “Military Mama”. You are interested in you’re own vanity. What I bring to this is valid criticism of a program that could hurt our country.

the simple fact of the matter is the “Mail our Military” website does not adequately explain to people the screening and I am very suspicious of this. I assure you in the future I will speak as loudly and as strongly. The behavior of those involved in this operation is atrocious and was deserving of the critique. It is only the lives of people who fight for this country who are at stake, don’t they deserve a strong debate on how to support them or are we going to betray our military again?

more: Message to a TALL DUDE