noahdavidsimon @Br3ndaBot apparently Jimmy Carter will be 1 of6 Super-Super Delegates2decide this primary.How can this man’s sanity b even taken seriously? about 19 hours ago from web in reply to Br3ndaBot
noahdavidsimon @Br3ndaBot if you are a person, you could save a lot of energy and just use eliza in a script on twitter. it’s a shame to waste a human about 18 hours ago from web in reply to Br3ndaBot
andrewbadera @noahdavidsimon but @br3ndabot is like one of those inflatable plastic clowns .. no matter how much you knock it down, it pops right back up about 18 hours ago from web in reply to noahdavidsimon
markdavidson @noahdavidsimon It’s not a loaded question. I did not deploy complex question. Rather than attack me personally, attack my argument. about 18 hours ago from web in reply to noahdavidsimon
noahdavidsimon @markdavidson no doubt if there were no race, human fallibility would invent it. You can create yer racist terms any way U want 2draw them about 18 hours ago from web in reply to markdavidson
noahdavidsimon @markdavidson GOTCHA question.It is wrong 2elaborate on either side of the argument.RACE s a human standard for dissection and objectivity. about 18 hours ago from web in reply to markdavidson
Tu quoque (Latin for “You, too” or “You, also”) is a Latin term used to mean an accusation of hypocrisy. The argument states that a certain position is false or wrong and/or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to act consistently in accordance with that position; it attempts to show that a criticism or objection applies equally to the person making it. It can be considered an ad hominem argument, since it focuses on the opposite party itself, rather than its positions. 
markdavidson @noahdavidsimon Changing the subject is a form of distraction in debate. Whether I am racist or an asshole is irrelevant to my argument. about 17 hours ago from web in reply to noahdavidsimon
noahdavidsimon @markdavidson I addressed your racism already. Relative 2defending Jewish dignity, Jimmy Carter s RACIST n so are you http://xrl.us/biv76 about 18 hours ago from web in reply to markdavidson
markdavidson @noahdavidsimon When people make comments like yours it undermines and dilutes legitimate racial, cultural, and religious struggles. about 17 hours ago from web in reply to noahdavidsimon
noahdavidsimon @markdavidson another personal attack? this s over. yer blocked. bigotry s a human invention. righteously we can then attack them as such. about 18 hours ago from web in reply to markdavidson
markdavidson @noahdavidsimon I blocked you about 6 pages back. I’m sure if you had a rational argument, you would have made one. http://urltea.com/333k about 17 hours ago from web in reply to noahdavidsimon
noahdavidsimon @tindle took almost 20 tweets 4 him 2kind of acknowledge that racism was a human axiom, then he switched 2 arbitrary perspective arguments about 18 hours ago from web in reply to tindle
markdavidson @noahdavidsimon BTW, Jimmy Carter is not “racist” against Jews. He’s not even anti-semitic. Please enjoy the rest of your morning. about 17 hours ago from web in reply to noahdavidsimon
tindle I feel a campaign coming on… lol about 18 hours ago from web
noahdavidsimon @tindle somebody give me any money n I will make a profit out of anything. reputation is where the money is.I can sell a postmodern argument about 18 hours ago from web in reply to tindle
Check out this interesting question on Yedda
I took a Jewish history classes at Carnegie Mellon University. I received a "C" for arguing this with a professor about this one issue, even though I did all my work creatively and efficiently. The professor was even a friend of my grandmothers (because of this I wont use her name). She was wrong and she should not of graded me accordingly. Jewish history can be looked at from many different perspectives and it is unfortunate that CMU used this woman as a tool. It is not surprising to see Palestinian slants coming from Humanity and Arts departments at CMU these days. My teacher and other Jews like her set the precedent for future intolerance by refusing to budge on issues coming out of the Holocaust. The goal of the Jewish people as is the Christian people is a worldwide Zion. The juxtaposition of how this Zion occurs is a matter of contention, but both faiths believe in the accession of a greater global government called Israel. The people who started this movement were called Jews. They are in fact closely related to each other and are debatably a "RACE". Christians maintain that this government will come with the acceptance of theyre leader, and therefor Christians are a part of this same Zion. Jews believe that theyre future leader will come and some like myself believe that the scripture is misleading and that while there will be key leaders, that this Zion will come through the actions of people and the details of the messiah will be unknown till it is known and obvious. Regardless of the slant on Zion, the end conclusion of Zionism is a belief in key people who are of close genetic relation and the peoples they friend. Converts of Judaism become not only part of a philosophy, but part of the physical "People" in that the hope is that theyre blood will mingle into a Jewish gene pool. It is also part of Christian theology… a concept of the Christian people and Republic, with the Juxtaposition that Israel will become part of this Christian Zionist Republic. This is not Fascism, nor is it bigotry. The very reason both cultures have a process of conversion is to keep the people from being elitist and therefor racist. The State of Israel is not the final Zion. The modern state of Israel is a defense to keep the people alive to embrace the coming evolution. It is in fact a necessary compromise, because the next evolution of Israel will be global. It is very possible that the people of Israel might might be destroyed and the people executed and that a new genetic group with the same philosophy could rise from the ashes and become the new Israel. (however I feel like I am making some kind of Hollywood movie when I talk like this)
Racism itself is a term that developed recently. Race generally concerns the color of a persons skin. It is a silly term. The Jewish concept of RACE is a more beautiful embrace of difference then the silly dynamic of BLACK, WHITE, BROWN, RED, YELLOW, in that the Jewish concept of RACE is inclusive. That is not to say there arent some horrible exceptions to this and perhaps that is why ZION has not arrived yet. My best friend is a Yemenite Jew. He looks like the people of KUSH culture. His skin is dark and I would have no issue mingling so to speak genetically with some of his beautiful dark skinned relatives. I would have no issue with any of my family having dark skinned children, and in fact I do have dark skinned relatives on my mothers side.
twitteratti are horrible… its like anywhere else….
IRONICALLY THIS HAPPENED ON MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY!
Nazis expect every JEW to be a philosopher…
lucky for me I am well read and educated… I actually gave an intelligent answer… but the simple fact of the matter is if someone insists on knowing if JEWS are a religion or a culture/religion… it is neither and it is both.
It can be one thing for one person and another for another.
language insists on declaring JEWS as not a RACE because of Hitler… but that is incorrect, because the vast majority of us are related…. or as related as say BLACK people are who mix as well…. point being is that RACE is a human construct, designed to help us deal with generalities that are real. That doesnt always mean we can define things uniformly.
JEWS are a RACE and also not a RACE…
but for this angry dude that answer was unacceptable.
intolerance comes from not being able to objectify people. Intolerance comes from finding something out of a classification that one is used to. This guy with all his arrogance was a classic BIGOT. I am amazed the people on TWITTER let this happen. Like a line in the sand as in UN 242, classifying is designed to help, but it is not a classification that is beyond exception. I understand how frustrating it can be for people to not have things uniform and convenient, but human relations and also language evolves and defies this kind of determined bias.
People like things to stay the same… but they dont. The classification of what we consider to be BLACK or WHITE, Jew or Gentile will evolve. Most of what we have dealt with over the last century is a reflection of HITLERs convenient classification of an enemy, but that does not mean that most JEWS are not genetically related to each other. To call some one a RACIST for hating JEWS is fair game… and that classification can change as well.
the TWITTER conversation is here for your analysis
Are JEWS a RACE? What is your slant on this?
Asked by SimonStudio on April 06, 2008
View the entire discussion on Yedda