Award

October 30, 2007

CLICK 4 YOUR REWARD


Award

October 30, 2007


My cat got run over today. Every pet I ever had gets murdered on Halloween.

He is now dead. He was my best friend and he was very brave. He wasn’t afraid of any dog.

Not even my Labrador retriever. Kitty is now dead. I am very sad about that. I am moarning.

I’m not kidding. His name was “Trembles” and he wasn’t scared of anything…

Not even the road and that car the crushed his little skull.

My West Highland White Terrior also met her end on Halloween around a decade or so ago.






Being and Time

October 19, 2007

Being and Time

October 19, 2007

Amanda Chapel; I thought she was gone?
I’m not getting a real life sex change.
I like being a guy in life.


Jean Baudrillard was explaining in “Symbolic Exchange and Death”:
Power comes from the virtual.
I have no problem wearing the pants in life,
but I see benefit to the symbolism of being a woman.
I just want to be able to talk about sex online without being censored.
I’m tired of being wussy like Dr. Phil. I want to be dirty old crone like Dr. Ruth.
I see no benefit to being just a social butterfly.

I think if you were true to your art, you’d cut off your wiener.

Sincerely,

– Amanda Chapel


After realizing that Amanda Chapel was an alias for a group of people and not actually a woman, it dawned on me that the marketing possibilities for an entity that is perceived as being a female are different then an entity that is perceived as being male. I am conceiving of creating a female fake alias and I am curious as to your input on the pros and cons of a virtual sex changes. I have seen pages owned by women on facebook that seem to be plainly pornographic, because of their status as women they are not disabled. My artwork is not pornographic, but does deal with gender issues. After having three aliases destroyed by the facebook police, I feel that I can not safely be honest as a man. Many have said to me that I should stop using facebook if I don’t like it. Being that faebook is an academic monopoly I do not have that option. There is no other place to have a dialogue, but I am not comfortable being a man on facebook any more, even though I am quite comfortable with my heterosexual lifestyle in life. I am busy creating a female identity. I have figured that facebook is using video these days. So I am going to have an actress voice all the random blips of responses that an alias would have to say if it were female. I do not believe it is a form of artificial intelligence in that I do not believe my female will have any intelligence at all. Just the way facebook wants it. I know it is a strange compromise, but I do not feel the precedent and law involved in social networking is fair to any extent. It seems OK for a female to be aggressive in making “friends”, but threatening for a man to do so. I am very tired of the double standard. I am waiting for facebook to disable me and I will return as a cross dresser. I do hope you understand I am not changing myself… this is why I am sending this letter as a warning… I am changing my PR ability. I will not be leaving my real life girl, child or opinions. I am simply creating an identity to get my opinions out there. I look forward to hearing your ideas on this issue.


Click here and read my posted conversation about Hermaphroditus


Being and Time

October 19, 2007

Amanda Chapel; I thought she was gone?
I’m not getting a real life sex change.
I like being a guy in life.


Jean Baudrillard was explaining in “Symbolic Exchange and Death”:
Power comes from the virtual.
I have no problem wearing the pants in life,
but I see benefit to the symbolism of being a woman.
I just want to be able to talk about sex online without being censored.
I’m tired of being wussy like Dr. Phil. I want to be dirty old crone like Dr. Ruth.
I see no benefit to being just a social butterfly.

I think if you were true to your art, you’d cut off your wiener.

Sincerely,

– Amanda Chapel


After realizing that Amanda Chapel was an alias for a group of people and not actually a woman, it dawned on me that the marketing possibilities for an entity that is perceived as being a female are different then an entity that is perceived as being male. I am conceiving of creating a female fake alias and I am curious as to your input on the pros and cons of a virtual sex changes. I have seen pages owned by women on facebook that seem to be plainly pornographic, because of their status as women they are not disabled. My artwork is not pornographic, but does deal with gender issues. After having three aliases destroyed by the facebook police, I feel that I can not safely be honest as a man. Many have said to me that I should stop using facebook if I don’t like it. Being that faebook is an academic monopoly I do not have that option. There is no other place to have a dialogue, but I am not comfortable being a man on facebook any more, even though I am quite comfortable with my heterosexual lifestyle in life. I am busy creating a female identity. I have figured that facebook is using video these days. So I am going to have an actress voice all the random blips of responses that an alias would have to say if it were female. I do not believe it is a form of artificial intelligence in that I do not believe my female will have any intelligence at all. Just the way facebook wants it. I know it is a strange compromise, but I do not feel the precedent and law involved in social networking is fair to any extent. It seems OK for a female to be aggressive in making “friends”, but threatening for a man to do so. I am very tired of the double standard. I am waiting for facebook to disable me and I will return as a cross dresser. I do hope you understand I am not changing myself… this is why I am sending this letter as a warning… I am changing my PR ability. I will not be leaving my real life girl, child or opinions. I am simply creating an identity to get my opinions out there. I look forward to hearing your ideas on this issue.


Click here and read my posted conversation about Hermaphroditus


Being and Time

October 19, 2007

Amanda Chapel; I thought she was gone?
I’m not getting a real life sex change.
I like being a guy in life.



Jean Baudrillard was explaining in “Symbolic Exchange and Death”:
Power comes from the virtual.
I have no problem wearing the pants in life,
but I see benefit to the symbolism of being a woman.
I just want to be able to talk about sex online without being censored.
I’m tired of being wussy like Dr. Phil. I want to be dirty old crone like Dr. Ruth.
I see no benefit to being just a social butterfly.

I think if you were true to your art, you’d cut off your wiener.

Sincerely,

– Amanda Chapel


After realizing that Amanda Chapel was an alias for a group of people and not actually a woman, it dawned on me that the marketing possibilities for an entity that is perceived as being a female are different then an entity that is perceived as being male. I am conceiving of creating a female fake alias and I am curious as to your input on the pros and cons of a virtual sex changes. I have seen pages owned by women on facebook that seem to be plainly pornographic, because of their status as women they are not disabled. My artwork is not pornographic, but does deal with gender issues. After having three aliases destroyed by the facebook police, I feel that I can not safely be honest as a man. Many have said to me that I should stop using facebook if I don’t like it. Being that faebook is an academic monopoly I do not have that option. There is no other place to have a dialogue, but I am not comfortable being a man on facebook any more, even though I am quite comfortable with my heterosexual lifestyle in life. I am busy creating a female identity. I have figured that facebook is using video these days. So I am going to have an actress voice all the random blips of responses that an alias would have to say if it were female. I do not believe it is a form of artificial intelligence in that I do not believe my female will have any intelligence at all. Just the way facebook wants it. I know it is a strange compromise, but I do not feel the precedent and law involved in social networking is fair to any extent. It seems OK for a female to be aggressive in making “friends”, but threatening for a man to do so. I am very tired of the double standard. I am waiting for facebook to disable me and I will return as a cross dresser. I do hope you understand I am not changing myself… this is why I am sending this letter as a warning… I am changing my PR ability. I will not be leaving my real life girl, child or opinions. I am simply creating an identity to get my opinions out there. I look forward to hearing your ideas on this issue.


Click here and read my posted conversation about Hermaphroditus

Marketing is just a form of a persuasion in capitalism. The key word is persuasion. In convincing another of our point of view there has to be a reference point. A language and understanding of what the negatives and positives of each action and object contains. For there to be a dialogue of negative then positive there must be point of agreement. If there is no point of agreement then what you have is all negative. That is where I am right now with the administration of facebook. All negative and they will not give me a reference point to act in a positive. facebook as a marketing tool claims that they act in their own discretion (which is the quality of being discreet). If the rules are arbitrary, then I can only perform a negative. The only logistical decision I have is to react in a deconstructionist manner. Being that facebook is the dominant platform of persuasion… (it is the only academic social network that protects the elitism of an academy).. and being that the terms are arbitrary and opaque, I can not market myself and it is of little use to pretend that it is a network of liberal thought and argument. I do not see any competing platform to share thoughts in yet… so therefor meaning is virtual and arbitrary. I must multiply my negatives because to multiply these negatives with a positive will give me a negative. This is the marketing state we are in right now. To use the Coors beer analogy: The reference of the beers actually needing to cool ended up not having meaning. There was no negative to reference, and therefor no positive

click here to see what in the hell I’m talking about in Beer Marketing


facebook

October 8, 2007

FORGET THE TWIT-OUT, Why not Noah-Out

CLICK HERE for my arguments with facebook


CLICK HERE for my suspicions with facebook


CLICK HERE it could happen to you too!



Two-facebook, here’s my new face!—>

man who live in glass house dress in basement.—>

man who honest on facebook and twitter without firewalls unhappy.



CLICK here for suspicions


There was no warning for the disabled account. I assume you have had ample time to review. What is the issue and why was the account disabled? If you continue to silence voices, you will have a difficult time breaking into a larger market share in the United States. This is not China. Not everyone has the same opinions. You are hurting your chances of selling your company if it is built on censorship. The tyrannical “Leftists” in the Universities that I am very famliar with might of played your game, but in the long run the larger population will not. I have more freedom in my real life existence in the United States of America then I do online dealing with your poor excuse of a social network alternative.

I wish facebook itself could clarify these issues.
I find it obnoxious that a company supposively worth more then the country of Bolivia’s net economy does not clearly state these things. Further… they do not respond promptly. It is important for facebook to have people ready to have a dialogue about what they feel is out of bounds. Any specific codes are obviously precedent. I do not expect to log in each time and agree to the Mosaic Ten Commandments…. but an on going dialog with official representatives would be nice. It is obvious that facebook doesn’t care because they have no concern for the community.

I’m ANGRY that I still have not received a response from facebook.
I get the feeling that the problem of facebook is that it puts too much responsibility into one enterprise.




Anyone says anything out of line and Zuckerburg goes fascist because the Volvo Soccer moms get angry (the same people who buy the majority of products and thus fuel the economy… the ladies that changed your diapers).



I don’t know what to think. I think they are confused themselves. Someone must of complained… and they are trying to get details. This is my guess. I also get the feeling that the different departments of facebook do not have a lot of communication. I noticed that it was mentioned about how social networking does not allow us to create social working “Firewalls” based on the category of connection. If facebook had had these firewalls I would not be spending my week begging Zuckerburg to reinact my account. Many people when they see a nude body drawn get upset. I can understand their feelings. I am not completely insensitive. I am not a cartoon version of an artist who thinks he should get away with a public exhibition of the “Virgin Mary” painted in elephant dung (if you remember recent Brooklyn Museum history).

Jeff Pulver mentioned that facebook is more then Web 2.0… that facebook is the Operating System of Web 2.0. So I guess that makes MYSPACE the MS-DOS. So when is MYSPACE going to upgrade and put a Windows shell in? The tyranny of one O.S. can not continue. PROGRAMMERS…. someone can make a lot of money (and I’m only telling you this because I’m not one)…

Listen:
If facebook is the O.S.
why not make a widget that is full facebook Ap compatible…. and yet could be put in any BLOG or even MYSPACE. This would bust the whole system open. It is only a matter of time before some programmer NABSTERS the OS away from these college politically correct fascists. why doesn’t myspace do it? RUPERT MURDOCH… I know your making too much money off your satelite business to see any profit from this. But if you really are against the tyranny of the “Left” like you claim! PLEASE DO THIS. facebook is the STALINISM of the 21st century. WE NEED A FREE MARKET OF OPEN DECENT SOCIAL NETWORKS
MAKE ZUCKERBURG OPEN SOURCE facebook. NO ONE SHOULD BE THROWN OFF A SOCIAL NETWORK FOR TRYING TO FRIEND SOMEONE OR FOR POLITICAL SLANTS. YOU DON”T WANT TO FRIEND ME? FINE. I’M TIRED OF BEING CHAPERONED!

What is myspace really lacking?
(1) feed and Elite Networks
(2) video
(3) graffiti wall
(4) Blog friends
myspace doesn’t need zombies and vampires

HACK facebook!

I’m existential about loving chaos or order… but see a design that is beyond cognition… the conceptual reverence between Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking in math is nothing but semiotics. One sees g-d, the other thinks there is math that he can not see. Does it matter what you call it? Even the Vatican looked at Hawking’s theories and had no qualms with it. The danger is when people stop looking because they are afraid of what they might find out. I am for pragmatic thinking… personal benefit… against supply side egalitarian moralism/”Leftism” because they have stopped looking. When it comes to desire, the libidinal, gender theory… it is the left who is afraid of what they might find. Follow Gloria Steinem close enough and you get Paris Hilton. Our understanding of our sexual nature was stunted the moment Anna Freud turned her daddies documents into a PR campaign. No wonder psychoanalysis has become a nightmare of Chemicals and Shock treatment?

Speaking of corporate accountability: as a former employee of “Tower Records”, I can quote from experience that this is a primary example where poor decisions eventually led to “Tower Records” demise. While there I often spoke to the customers and found my higher ups @ “Tower Records” to be quite hostile to free thought. Though I was still in school at the time, I found my customers to be more loyal when I actually got to know them. “Tower Records” preferred the “Blockbuster Video” corporate strategy of non opinionated workers. When I left “Tower” I warned them that the one advantage of creating loyal customers was through opinions, because most people simply preferred to download music for free. Opinions are the reason people buy recorded media. The future idea of the media was one where the employees gave recommendations and interacted with people. “Tower Records” failed to heed my warning and now no longer exists. This is not delusions of grandeur. “Tower Records” failed to understand what the media was all about. When you centralize ideas into a forum and create a capitalized system where people pay or are advertised to, the danger is that people might go to another venue if the system of distribution is censored. The argument against this is the “Blockbuster” strategy of monopolization or governments like China. My arguments against these tyrannies are that in the long term censorship will not work. Essentially we are now going to see the same thing occur on facebook. Censorship besides being illegal is not a governing economic principle of information. Information wants to be free!

Boycott the facebook establishment for the banishment of
Noah David Simon

The Action of disabling without justification is wrong.
If there were something that would warrant disabling a persons hard work, you would know
immediately and inform the person. We assume facebook as a large corporation has adequate resources to identify deviancy immediately and to explain what happened… facebook has failed to keep it’s users notified as to what unauthorized use would be. Wrongful conduct would be obvious. The only reason to take such exaggerated action is if online behavior could be easily identified. Since facebook can not identify a problem within a two day period it is not wrong to ask then to stop this discriminatory action. Artists should be
appreciated and should not be under unnecessary surveillance relative to anyone other individuals.

LEAVE A VOICE COMMENT!
Please give Noah your support by leaving a comment!

Click Here 4 some examples of facebook graffiti wall work Noah has done.


Ironically the very last drawing done by Noah David Simon on facebook

was the armless artist who killed a man with head butt.


I am now using web 0.0 social networking. I call it Judaism. I uninstalled the applications for Jesus, Mohammad, and Gloria Steinem. As much as I loved some of the people there, I found it easier not to network with them. I also uninstalled Vampires and Zombies. I hope to get some of the people back through my Blog.

I tried installing the Atheist Social Network. It wouldn’t run without an operating system.

Noah David Simon 212 933 0533


If you need to tell Noah something contact Maxx Simon by clicking here

CLICK HERE FOR THE PUNISHMENT