What do men and women really want? « Richard Wiseman’s Blog

I asked men and women to come up with the three traits that they most desired in a romantic partner. I have now made a word cloud of the results. So…here is what women look for….

and here is what men look for….

What do you think? What are the main differences?

via richardwiseman.wordpress.com

You have to read behind the words to understand what the genders are saying. When women say “funny” they don’t mean “funny”…which is actually not a trait that generally relates to strength and a stronger mate (most comedians are losers). what they mean by funny is a lighter more compatible personality that doesn’t take life so seriously. they certainly aren’t looking for a dry type of humor. they mean something other then the word funny.

Same goes for the men who really aren’t asking for intelligence. they are asking for empathy and respect that doesn’t patronize …and finally of course all these desire traits are if the superficial stuff is taken care of… money and physical traits. Studies have been made regarding the Genders and it was found that both genders are influenced by visual stimulations (this contradicts general popular opinion that only men are looking for physical traits). however the women are looking for body gestures that convey strength… while men are looking directly at a woman’s face… that conveys her fertility and ability to nurture. When women say funny… they really mean confidence. When men say intelligence they are correlating a desire for facial approval which is what they are libidinally drawn to. Men looking at a girls posterior or breasts first is a complete myth.

As someone who grew up in NY and LA and knows plenty of professional “Comedians” who are not as famous as Jerry Seinfeld I assure you that women are not saying what they want. The top quality or attribute that women want is by no means a “sense of humor”. If it was then a lot of starving Comedians would be doing a lot better in their love life. Men are certainly not looking for “Intelligence”. the GENDERS will never be honest. no body is exactly the same, but no serious scientist would take the results here seriously. …of course.. with Global Warming and Gloria Steinem politically slanted Porn statistics from the 70s will attest to historically… who knows what the cultural gender snobs will attest to this week. The Gender fascist are social engineers of a religion and they create their “science” as it goes along. this Lysenkoism next week will put every 14 year old boy on Prozac as the Hilary Clinton pant suit parade pushes a gender slanted stimulus bill. I’m sure you think that women actually are looking for a “sense of humor” when in fact they are looking for a bully to do their bidding. All opinions must submit to the Donna Hanover and the Vagina Monologues…. dare we question the Gloria Steinem state?

feminism is old fashioned

Pre Islamic Middle East had Matriarchal religions of the snake.

my hypothesis is that Islam was a reaction to this.

a study of Snake based Matriarchal Religion and it’s polarity influence on Islam:

Click to Play

Improve Your Heatlh- Have More Sex

kind of hard to do if the ladies aren’t sticking around because the guys are all broke from the gender controls of the feminists running the government… sigh. wonder what the statistics are on dildos?

“Researchers have long known that not only is sex fun (when done with the right person, of course), but that people who have frequent sex tend to live longer and have healthier hearts and lower rates of certain cancers. These studies also show that men with an active sex life have healthier sperm, and sexually active women have fewer menopause symptoms.”

The story goes on to report that studies show the following benefits as well:

1. A longer life
2. A healthier heart
3. Lower blood pressure
4. Lower risk of breast cancer
5. Lower risk of prostate cancer
6. Pain relief
7. A slimmer physique
8. Better testosterone levels
9. Fewer menopause symptoms
10. Healthier semen

CNN has the news:

via wwwjackbenimble.blogspot.com

The New “Gender Gap”: You Know Who’s Really Hardest Hit . . .

kind of hard to do if the ladies aren’t sticking around because the guys are all broke from the gender controls of the feminists running the government… sigh. wonder what the statistics are on dildos?

CNN has the news:

“Researchers have long known that not only is sex fun (when done with the right person, of course), but that people who have frequent sex tend to live longer and have healthier hearts and lower rates of certain cancers. These studies also show that men with an active sex life have healthier sperm, and sexually active women have fewer menopause symptoms.”

The story goes on to report that studies show the following benefits as well:

1. A longer life
2. A healthier heart
3. Lower blood pressure
4. Lower risk of breast cancer
5. Lower risk of prostate cancer
6. Pain relief
7. A slimmer physique
8. Better testosterone levels
9. Fewer menopause symptoms
10. Healthier semen

via wwwjackbenimble.blogspot.com

Neal Boyle completed training for a truck driver’s license after being laid off in March from the US Gypsum plant in Charlestown and failing to find good-paying work elsewhere. (Robert E. Klein for The Boston Globe

via boston.com

Recession?: Only for Men; Women Gain in Tough Economy

Men are losing jobs at far greater rates than women as the industries they dominate, such as manufacturing, construction, and investment services, are hardest hit by the downturn. Some 1.1 million fewer men are working in the United States than there were a year ago, according to the Labor Department. By contrast, 12,000 more women are working

via debbieschlussel.com

Read more on Debbie Schlussel’s blog or you will get CANCER like Barbara Ehrenreich… you have been warned! bah wah ah ah hah hah

Posted via web from noahdavidsimon’s posterous

Recession?: Only for Men; Women Gain in Tough Economy

There is discriminatory spending by our government of the stimulus bill. It has gotten so bad that the media is renaming the recession the “Man-cession”. The only sector of the economy that is in growth are jobs that women are stronger at. Pink collar over the last ten years has grown 10%. Keep in mind there isn’t any equivalence between the sexes in other ways because society is unforgiving to unemployed men and we do not have a domestic option. The educational system has also gone out of it’s way to discriminate towards men. and yet our government is still pushing affirmative action in the stimulus bill? someone has to explain to these feminists about social engineering… it has always failed the people. While the Pink Collar fascists still have pictures of Hillary Clinton and her pant suit crew on their profile pictures on facebook, out-of-wedlock births to young women is getting out of hand… and guess what? It isn’t daddy’s fault!

Men are losing jobs at far greater rates than women as the industries they dominate, such as manufacturing, construction, and investment services, are hardest hit by the downturn. Some 1.1 million fewer men are working in the United States than there were a year ago, according to the Labor Department. By contrast, 12,000 more women are working

Read more at debbieschlussel.com or you will get CANCER like Barbara Ehrenreich… you have been warned! bah wah ah ah hah hah

someone has to explain to these feminists about social engineering… it has always failed the people. While the Pink Collar fascists still have pictures of Hillary Clinton and her pant suit crew on their profile pictures on facebook, out-of-wedlock births to young women is getting out of hand… and guess what? It isn’t daddy’s fault!

Inflation-adjusted median income for young families has declined from $44,000 in 1979 to $38,000 in 2007, Sum said. During the same period, as jobs that allowed less-educated men to support a family have diminished, out-of-wedlock births to young women rose to 50 percent of births, from 20 percent in 1980

via boston.com

Over the past couple of decades, the male-female ratio on campuses has been changing dramatically. Women outnumber men by a 4-3 ratio on college campuses. Men currently make up only 43 percent of college graduates. In short, many today acknowledge that there is a crisis of the disappearing educated male.

sexist campus activism of participants in the nation’s 500 college gender studies departments. The conference program, attended by about 100 professors and student affairs personnel, exposed some unpleasant facts: men are “overrepresented” in drug and alcohol abuse, violations of campus regulations, and acts of violence and sexual assault, and they are “underrepresented” in academic programs and campus leadership activities.

Over the past couple of decades, the male-female ratio on campuses has been changing dramatically. Women outnumber men by a 4-3 ratio on college campuses. Men currently make up only 43 percent of college graduates.

In short, many today acknowledge that there is a crisis of the disappearing educated male.

Hostility toward men and masculinity begins in daycare and increases each year thereafter. Sexual harassment training and policies have created an uncertain environment, if not a hostile one, where men have to watch their every word and action lest it be misunderstood or misinterpreted. Some experts criticize a campus “worldview that sees things only in terms of oppressors and the oppressed.” Typically, the few campus men’s studies programs are designed to push an anti-masculinity agenda.

via americanthinker.com

the women shit on us. they take all the jobs. meanwhile affirmative action in the stimulus bill when the industry that is effected by job losses is men’s. the problem is getting worse, but the burden is all men’s

the feminists then demonstrated the death grip they hold over Obama and the leaders of the Democratic Party. The feminists swung into action with noisy accusations that the stimulus discriminated against women because its jobs would go mostly to men.

The feminists had no sympathy with the fact that men were victims of most of the lost jobs because the majority of manufacturing and construction jobs are men’s jobs. The segments of our economy dominated by women — social services, education, health, childcare and welfare — have actually gained jobs during this recession.

Nevertheless, the feminists demanded that half the stimulus jobs be given to women. The feminists worked to achieve this result by directing the stimulus funds into the types of jobs where women predominate and by allocating at least a third of the spending in manufacturing and construction industries to training women for those men’s jobs.

All the feminist organizations joined in the political clatter. They called for a meeting so they could lecture Obama’s economic advisers and hurl their demands that the stimulus package create jobs that women like, such as workplace-comfortable inside jobs with air-conditioned offices and carpeted floors.

As one tactic to intimidate Obama administration officials, the feminists successfully insisted that participants in the meeting be seated in a circle without a table between them — a format that enabled the feminists to be confrontational. The feminists created their own vocabulary to shout at the men, demanding jobs for “human infrastructure” and “human bridges,” which were euphemisms for social service, health-care, childcare and librarian jobs.

via townhall.com

The feminists were well aware that Obama’s chief economist is Larry Summers, the former president of Harvard University, who had already proven himself a pushover for pushy feminists. His embarrassing confrontation with hysterical feminist faculty over academic math and science professorships proved that there is no way to appease the feminists and that apologizing to them only makes matters worse

via townhall.com

60% of college grads and grad school programs like law degrees are occupied by women. I don’t have a problem with this, but it is a little unfair to ask for affirmative action.we idolize Asia’s strong educational ethos, but seem to fear Asia’s strong cultural patriarchal view of the family. strong traditional Jewish values were patriarchal too. I’m not saying that we should turn the world upside down for anyone, but the gender revolution and our school’s ability to create innovators seem to be running parallel. women have strengths. their emotional quotient gets work in the modern world, why are we still doing this to men? Gender Engineering is destructive to all of us.

oh… and stop thinking I hate women. I love women… I want women. they don’t want me because I don’t have a job and they do.

G-spot doesn’t appear to exist say researchers and I am pissed at the ladies who said I could not find it

how many times did the feminists preach to you about this one? Another day, another fiction of the gender engineers. The hope that monoculture could create equivalences between the genders just hit another speed bump.

Some are firm believers The elusive erogenous zone said to exist in some women may be a myth, say researchers who have hunted for it. well I could of told them that, but then the jokes would of been flying Their study in the Journal of Sexual Medicine is the biggest yet, involving 1,800 women, and it found no proof. The King’s College London team believe the G-spot may be a figment of women’s imagination, encouraged by magazines and sex therapists. But sexologist Beverley Whipple who helped popularise the G-spot idea said the work was “flawed”. hey Beverly… why did you popularise it then? Might it be power issues? She said the researchers had discounted the experiences of lesbian or bisexual women and failed to consider the effects of having different sexual partners with different love-making techniques. so only lesbians or bisexuals can attempt variety? oh… I get it… as long it isn’t a man. the moment that talk about Homosexuality then it has to be good… right? typical bias in academia. It’s a wonder we aren’t extinct by now. It is rather irresponsible to claim the existence of an entity that has never been proven and pressurise women and men too Study author Andrea Burri The women in the study, who were all pairs of identical and non-identical twins, were asked whether they had a G-spot. hey,,, now that sounds fun. If one did exist, it would be expected that both identical twins, who have the same genes, would report having one. now eugenics and Lysenkoism? Perhaps no field of scientific inquiry is as likely to be misunderstood and abused as genetics. Part of the misunderstanding arises from archaic views about what genes are and how they are expressed during development. The extreme abuse of genetic information at various times has mainly been attributable to larger efforts to use genetic arguments in order to shape society and science according to political agendas (i.e., eugenics and Lysenkoism). If this is the backdrop against which culture assimilates genetic information, then what will happen as a result of the current genetic revolution? Genetic knowledge and technology are advancing at . . . [Full Text of this Article] via content.nejm.org But this pattern did not emerge and the identical twins were no more likely to share a G-spot than non-identical twins who share only half of their genes. conclusion wrong. end result recorded correctly Mythical Co-author of the study Professor Tim Spector said: “Women may argue that having a G-spot is due to diet or exercise, but in fact it is virtually impossible to find real traits. I think it has something to do with being a manipulative tyrant in bed and not letting men be men. sit back and enjoy the ride ladies. telling us what to do isn’t fun for you either. It’s fine to go looking for the G-spot but do not worry if you don’t find it Sexual psychologist Dr Petra Boynton “This is by far the biggest study ever carried out and shows fairly conclusively that the idea of a G-spot is subjective.” is that what it was? subjective? I could of sworn it meant that you were bullshit. Colleague Andrea Burri was concerned that women who feared they lacked a G-spot might feel inadequate, which she says is unnecessary. notice a man’s feelings aren’t important here “It is rather irresponsible to claim the existence of an entity that has never been proven and pressurise women and men too.” that’s better… thanks for caring about that part, but what about men’s feelings? don’t we have any? Dr Petra Boynton, a sexual psychologist at University College London, said: “It’s fine to go looking for the G-spot but do not worry if you don’t find it. “It should not be the only focus. Everyone is different.” here is the reality: if your woman is really selfish… which most are these days. they like to hop around on top and ignore you… that is if they haven’t rejected men completely because most of us are broke from the abuse The Gräfenberg Spot, or G-Spot, was named in honour of the German gynaecologist Ernst Gräfenberg who described it over 50 years ago and is said to sit in the front wall of the vagina some 2-5cm up. I kept on pressing the button after I heard about it… even in a Cartoon called Southpark…. and it didn’t make her happy. it is the up and down that does it… and frankly that is all over, but relative to an area. also just because you know where that area is… doesn’t mean you know what to do with it. it can make the ladies uncomfortable as well and frankly it is your attitude that is more important… for both sexes. Recently Italian scientists claimed they could locate the G-spot using ultrasound scans. They said they had found an area of thicker tissue among the women reporting orgasms. But specialists warned there could be other reasons for this difference.

via news.bbc.co.uk

Posted via web from noahdavidsimon’s posterous

Hey Rosa Brooks, mommy Barbara Ehrenreich has breast lumps

Barbara Ehrenreich has breast cancer. …I’m now in a good mood. maybe the disease will take her wench daughter too.

“Cancer is not a problem or an illness – it’s a gift. Or so Barbara Ehrenreich was told repeatedly after her diagnosis. But the positive thinkers are wrong, she says: sugar-coating illnesses can exact a dreadful cost”

via guardian.co.uk

Nah it’s great news. it means your days are limited Barb. I’m glad you are dying. you made life miserable for the male sex. Take your feminism and die painfully and slowly. Do us a favor and write an agonizing synopsis of what it feels like to loose your knockers. I’m very curious about all the agonizing details. you know? for posterity at the very least. do I sound bitter?

Our biggest failure in Iraq was listening to the nation builders. we were there to defend ourselves by killing people who had murdered us, not die for the feminists. It was supposed to be reactive not proactive. social control is bad. it is ok to set up boundaries and define a culture within a small border like what Israel does, but to actively conquer with the intent to orchestrate a better society is always a fail. I am not a thug. I believe in free thought for all people and I certainly appreciate women’s right to vote, but I draw the line on the so called “progressive” feminists of the 70s that reflected social engineering ideas like Trofim Lysenko’s. Mary Wollstonecraft is my hero, but Barbara Ehrenreich, Gloria Steinem and Dworkin don’t just go too far, these hags have destroyed enlightenment ideas of equality. they are interested in control of civilization as they see fit. it is no coincidence that Western society began to tumble right around the time of the 70s. the cancer that Ehrenreich has come down with is nothing compared to the cancer she spread.

Barbara Ehrenreich was against the war,

but mainly because she was hostile towards Western men.

She thought we were merely guising our nation building

as a wolf in sheeps clothing. She was wrong.

Our leaders really thought they were liberating women.

we need to start respecting our warriors.

Over the past couple of decades, the male-female ratio on campuses has been changing dramatically. Women outnumber men by a 4-3 ratio on college campuses. Men currently make up only 43 percent of college graduates. In short, many today acknowledge that there is a crisis of the disappearing educated male.

\

sexist campus activism of participants in the nation’s 500 college gender studies departments. The conference program, attended by about 100 professors and student affairs personnel, exposed some unpleasant facts: men are “overrepresented” in drug and alcohol abuse, violations of campus regulations, and acts of violence and sexual assault, and they are “underrepresented” in academic programs and campus leadership activities.

Over the past couple of decades, the male-female ratio on campuses has been changing dramatically. Women outnumber men by a 4-3 ratio on college campuses. Men currently make up only 43 percent of college graduates.

In short, many today acknowledge that there is a crisis of the disappearing educated male.

Hostility toward men and masculinity begins in daycare and increases each year thereafter. Sexual harassment training and policies have created an uncertain environment, if not a hostile one, where men have to watch their every word and action lest it be misunderstood or misinterpreted. Some experts criticize a campus “worldview that sees things only in terms of oppressors and the oppressed.” Typically, the few campus men’s studies programs are designed to push an anti-masculinity agenda.

via americanthinker.com

the women shit on us. they take all the jobs. meanwhile affirmative action in the stimulus bill when the industry that is effected by job losses is men’s. the problem is getting worse, but the burden is all men’s

the feminists then demonstrated the death grip they hold over Obama and the leaders of the Democratic Party. The feminists swung into action with noisy accusations that the stimulus discriminated against women because its jobs would go mostly to men.

The feminists had no sympathy with the fact that men were victims of most of the lost jobs because the majority of manufacturing and construction jobs are men’s jobs. The segments of our economy dominated by women — social services, education, health, childcare and welfare — have actually gained jobs during this recession.

Nevertheless, the feminists demanded that half the stimulus jobs be given to women. The feminists worked to achieve this result by directing the stimulus funds into the types of jobs where women predominate and by allocating at least a third of the spending in manufacturing and construction industries to training women for those men’s jobs.

All the feminist organizations joined in the political clatter. They called for a meeting so they could lecture Obama’s economic advisers and hurl their demands that the stimulus package create jobs that women like, such as workplace-comfortable inside jobs with air-conditioned offices and carpeted floors.

As one tactic to intimidate Obama administration officials, the feminists successfully insisted that participants in the meeting be seated in a circle without a table between them — a format that enabled the feminists to be confrontational. The feminists created their own vocabulary to shout at the men, demanding jobs for “human infrastructure” and “human bridges,” which were euphemisms for social service, health-care, childcare and librarian jobs.

via townhall.com

The feminists were well aware that Obama’s chief economist is Larry Summers, the former president of Harvard University, who had already proven himself a pushover for pushy feminists. His embarrassing confrontation with hysterical feminist faculty over academic math and science professorships proved that there is no way to appease the feminists and that apologizing to them only makes matters worse

via townhall.com

60% of college grads and grad school programs like law degrees are occupied by women. I don’t have a problem with this, but it is a little unfair to ask for affirmative action.we idolize Asia’s strong educational ethos, but seem to fear Asia’s strong cultural patriarchal view of the family. strong traditional Jewish values were patriarchal too. I’m not saying that we should turn the world upside down for anyone, but the gender revolution and our school’s ability to create innovators seem to be running parallel. women have strengths. their emotional quotient gets work in the modern world, why are we still doing this to men? Gender Engineering is destructive to all of us.

oh… and stop thinking I hate women. I love women… I want women. they don’t want me because I don’t have a job and they do.

The Last Temptation of Ruth

A play in one act

Written for the stage by

N()AH
DAVID
SIMON

Unemployment now leads to

the Death of the Dead.

Death becomes wrong.
The dead have no right.
No longer does death order,
The sacrifice of ones function.
The permanently unemployed are dead.
The order of the male will die.
An Androgynous world is a mass murder

with true equality.
Gender becomes unemployed.
———————————–
Ruth walks down an urban upper middle class street. It is cloudy and there is a slight breeze. It is the middle of winter and the weather has warmed for a frivolous calm. Bezelbub walks down the street.

(Bezelbub smiles to HIMSELF.)

Bezelbub

Ruth

Ruth

How did you know my name?

Bezelbub

If I want to know your name, then I know your name.

Ruth

(SHAKING HER HEAD IN THE NO POSITION.)

uh-uh

(SHAKES HER HEAD LEFT TO RIGHT AGAIN)

uh no, I think not Rumplestilskin.

Bezelbub

You don’t know what you want.

Ruth

I don’t want you.

Bezelbub

You already have me.

Ruth

I have pain. That is true.

Bezelbub

We have each other.

Ruth

You don’t have me. Nobody has me.

Bezelbub

I get what I want. I have complete control.

Ruth

You don’t have control over anything, not even control over your self.

Bezelbub

I will control.

Ruth

Your control?

Bezelbub

see this dollar?

Ruth

mmm-hmmm

Bezelbub

I will put this dollar on the ground. Like this.

Ruth

(cynically)

a magic trick.

Bezelbub

Nobody likes a skeptic

Ruth

do your trick.

Bezelbub

I am going to make the dollar move without touching it.

Ruth

I see

Bezelbub

Are you Ready?

Ruth

Yes, go ahead

Bezelbub

Make sure you are watching carefully.

Ruth

I’m watching. I’m watching.

(They both stare at the DOLLAR for 15 seconds. Nothing happens)

Ruth

Nothing happened.

(Bezelbub Smiles)

Ruth

Nothing happened. Nothing at all.

(RUTH GOES TO PICK UP THE DOLLAR. SHE PUTS THE DOLLAR IN HER POCKET)

Ruth

Thanks for the dollar!

Bezelbub

You see, it moved.

(Bezelbub SMILES)

Bezelbub

I did tell you. I control everything.

Ruth

You didn’t make it move. I moved it.

Bezelbub

I made you move it.

Ruth

no

Bezelbub

I just did. I control you and I can oppress you..

Ruth

How can you oppress me?

Bezelbub

If it isn’t me, then it is somebody else. Wherever you go. You will be oppressed. There is no escape. It is only through me that you can find freedom.

Ruth

Oh really. How do you offer freedom?

Bezelbub

I offer what some might call love. I offer understanding. I offer a mutual relationship of cooperation. I offer pleasure.

Ruth

Now the devil offers love!

Bezelbub

Love?

Another Abstract manifestation,

Ruth

who is the skeptic now?

Bezelbub

Water that is too pure

has no fish. You abuse the word love, so I don’t believe in it.

Ruth

You’re not evil. You’re ignorant.

Bezelbub

I offer pleasure. I offer freedom. I offer you the ability to do what you want.

Ruth

You offer stupidity.

Bezelbub

I offer the ability to escape from the burdens of society and live for you. I offer autonomy. I can do anything I want and so could you if you cooperate.

Ruth

are you threatening me? I don’t have to listen to this. Why should I trust you. Maybe you’re just getting off. Is that what your doing? You’re crossing the line.

Bezelbub

I’m telling you that I could. I didn’t say I would!

Ruth

Would what?

Bezelbub

Anything I want

Ruth

You can’t always get what you want. You might find that your actions have consequence.

Bezelbub

I decide my own consequence.

Some struggle with a way.

Some struggle with no way.

Ruth

You must have had a healthy normal family life.

Bezelbub

If you’re so afraid of me then why are you talking to me?

(Pause)

Bezelbub

Well?

Ruth

I’m trying to be polite. People are watching and I don’t want you to make a scene.

Bezelbub

Why are woman always doing what is socially sanctioned? All a woman desires is sensitivity from others, they don’t need a man to make them happy.

Ruth

You don’t really think that, do you? I know plenty of women who like sex with men.

Bezelbub

For women, sex is like cigarettes, coffee, or alcohol. They develop a taste for it and then they become addicted.

Ruth

I’ve had sex with men.

Bezelbub

I don’t doubt you. The women I know don’t even seem to get aroused by men until after their first experience. Once a woman has a heterosexual moment then a woman might develop a taste for it.

Ruth

Sex is a scary.

Bezelbub

It’s not quite as scary for men. Most women have to be talked into sex their first time. You know what the world would be like without men? A bunch of obese and content butch lesbians.

Ruth

Woman have more at stake then men. It’s not that they can’t enjoy sex, it’s simply that they are given a huge neurosis about it because they are the ones that could be pregnant.

Bezelbub

Rarely do women contemplate copulation without the children factor, because they have more at risk in pregnancy. Nine months of work is a bigger investment then a quick ejaculation.

Ruth

Is that fair?

Bezelbub

Life isn’t fair for men either. People choose sexual partners based on their populaces social pressures and their own sexual cravings, but usually only women fear the direct biological result.

Ruth

Maybe it is time for men to start worrying.

Bezelbub

Oh, men are worried now. Believe me it is nothing to wish for. Sex is dangerous for us all now, but mostly women fear sexual anarchy because it would allow every one to be unmonogamous.

Ruth

Monogamy protects women from being cheated. It protects men too.

Bezelbub

Yes, men can lose. But, like you said, men can’t become pregnant. You resent the fact that Bill Clinton cheated on Hillary, because it sets a precedent of sex without responsibility for men.

Ruth

I’m sorry, but sex without responsibility is not a good thing.

Bezelbub

You would think advances in birth control would make that phobia goes away. Men have to go out and earn a living while many women sit home and contemplate their newfound choices. Do you still think all men are given unlimited freedoms?

Ruth

but, your saying women are more likely to be gay by nature? A huge generalization!

Bezelbub

Your consider yourself gay, right?

Ruth

You’re crossing the line.

Bezelbub

A good generalization usually has exquisite truths in it that are correct more times then not. Reality itself exists only through generalization. To understand our existence and to operate in it we must generalize. I have generalized… but truth itself is a generalization.

Ruth

Your generalizations are in the mold of an eighteenth century sexist.

Bezelbub

So now I am in the eighteenth century? Is there an exquisite difference between the eighteenth century and now? Certainly women haven’t changed! Women are comprised of the same flesh today as they were yesterday. What has changed?

Ruth

Our roles have changed. Our perceptions of each other based on what is between our legs are different.

Bezelbub

Nothing has changed. The benefits and expenses of gender roles are still here and they are not going away.

Ruth

That’s because of you.

Bezelbub

No, it is because of you. Women tend desire for some kind of moral system, to control. You secretly desire a feminist hierarchy, like an intimidating boyfriend. Something to tell us what to do.

Ruth

I don’t want anyone to tell me what to do.

Bezelbub

Of course not. You want to control the boyfriend. Since you can’t completely control a man you are replacing him with political correctness. speaking of that oppressive boyfriend. Rape: Isn’t it odd how some woman enjoy the feeling of being victims. The ecstasy of being aware that a man was so needful that he broke his own morals. I have no moral values. You can’t break me.

Ruth

That is your mistake. You think we want to be controlled.

Bezelbub

Passive men are seen as weak to the opposite sex and therefor not worthy of copulation and progeny. I am not passive. For women one’s mate is seen as a gamble. A man who is strong enough to perform a violent sexual act is arousing for a woman because it proves a man’s autonomy from other males. Then that man becomes a commodity.

Ruth

Men generally are given the freedom to rape the world. They habitually use a strategy of control to fill their desires. Men rarely attempt submission as a way of also filling desires. They rarely think, if I were to contribute and take part then I might fill the minimal desires I need.

Bezelbub

Who do you think the men were pillaging the world for? Carnal pleasure. If they could of had it at home they wouldn’t of left their house. The eighteenth century wasn’t a utopia for men.

Ruth

The men back then had it better then the women.

Bezelbub

You’re deluded. maybe the sexism was installed into the workforce by men was created as a defense for a civilization struggling to escape from the brunt of responsibility forced on men by women.

Ruth

Some how I doubt that.

Bezelbub

Your welcome to doubt, but think about this. Boys are generally competitive, individualistic and yet highly efficient and will embark well into any interaction with the goal of personal benefit. If you allow personal benefit then the boys will be tolerable.

Ruth

Why should we fashion the world for a mutant male sex? Just because you guys can’t get along doesn’t mean the rest of us can’t. I say ignore the little boys and their little squabbles. The rest of us can get a long fine without you.

Bezelbub

You might just get what you are asking for. Modern birthing techniques allow women to have children without fertilization, therefor no men involved… meanwhile men can’t have children without the women’s ovary.

Ruth

That’s good to know!

Bezelbub

The sheep that they cloned genetically?… that was done with a blank ovary without male fertilization and a womb was still needed. The male sex is now completely obsolete!

Ruth

Well, you guys did it to yourself. Halaluya

Bezelbub

On the biological level men have always been at a position of vulnerability even with their general superior physical ability.

Ruth

oh I see, is that how western man raped billions of aborigine peoples.

Bezelbub

It always took only one man to fertilize millions of women. Today, one could create a society of almost all women, who would also be the workers. The male would be used only for fertilization and you would need only one male to do this. You could slaughter all the excess men.

Ruth

There is an idea.

Bezelbub

The amount of production a man could do in the majority of industries could easily be substituted with a women. Beyond the biological reproductive factor, no good comes from an aggressive gender in the mechanistic workings of a healthy society. If women had truly wanted to improve the efficiency, it would be the end of man. It is no wonder that man has instituted sexism into society. Sexism is man’s only defense against anialization.

Ruth

That was a twist that I wasn’t expecting. Men oppress because they have to?

Bezelbub

If you look historically at men who instituted genetic cleansing, you will find they all treated the women around them well. Hitler was great to all the women who were around him.

Ruth

What about all the non-Aryan women Hitler killed?

Bezelbub

In Hitler’s logic it is necessary to purify race. If you take Hitler’s philosophy a step further then you get a very militant feminist doctrine. The final purification based on scientific reduction is the death of the mutant and randomizing genes that comes from both Aryan and non-Aryan men.

Ruth

So Hitler would kill himself. Hurrah!

Bezelbub

Or he would attempt to get a sex change.

Maybe that is why we can’t find him today!

Ruth

Hitler as a woman. I think I’m going to barf.

Bezelbub

It’s possible.

Ruth

The mustache would have to go.

Bezelbub

There is nothing more dangerous to men then a man that listens to women. The pussy-whipped man is a man who installs fear into the mutants. The emancipation of womankind is freedom and that freedom from male oppression can only happen with the death of the mutant sex.. Women simply don’t need men…

Ruth

How true.

Bezelbub

The supposed emotional and spiritual companionship that men could offer women can be substituted with another woman.

Ruth

You think you are righteous in your contrary to the mainstream divergence, but yet you are consistent in doctrine with Judeo-Christianity in that you see salvation through men.

Bezelbub

I don’t appreciate the comparison. What is salvation when you have eternity? I do not see salvation through men. I see a continuance of the status quo in men.

Ruth

An unconventional neo-conservative.

Bezelbub

A label I can live with. The destruction of this planet and its natural system would be a paradox certainly in the concept of messianic deliverance, as would the extinction of the male sex. The death of mankind would destroy the Judaic concept of g-d and the devil.

Ruth

The bible describes true evil as always male like the force of good itself. The polarities of forces are always male. This is a mistake, but so is what you are saying. Instead of coming to the conclusion that gender identification is a complete sham, you have substituted women for the devil and left the benevolent father figure consistent with monotheism.

Bezelbub

Ha!, no woman has the balls to be the devil. This is no longer about what is righteous. This is about survival. If you see that as righteousness then that is your viewpoint. I see little benevolent in man… I’m man’s biggest supporter! I prefer the so-called chosen evil of men to the ways of irresolute women like you.

Ruth

If there was a devil do you think g-d would send him a card during the holiday?

Bezelbub

No.

Ruth

Do you think g-d says, “Hey, Lucifer how are things?” and Lucifer might say, “Not bad. A little hot down here in hell, but that’s the breaks of being damned. How are things in heaven?”

Bezelbub

That jerk!

Ruth

g-d is always a haughty guy who wouldn’t give Lucifer the time of day. Talk about an unforgiving father figure.

Bezelbub

Amen!

Ruth

Monotheism misleads us into a corner. To hell with the conviction that the realm of g-d is infinitely large by disregarding the diminutive truths.

Bezelbub

There is no one truth.

Ruth

I have my truth. The eternal trick of Western thought is that the knowledge has been coded with masculinity permanently for all eternity.

Bezelbub

Testify.

Ruth

The ultimate trick that Nietsche would understand, as the catch-22 of organized religion.

Bezelbub

Amen.

Ruth

Judaism began the misdeed by manifesting a fixed book. The Jewish commentary was continually building and changing, but the root core of the system was static.

Bezelbub

Amen.

Ruth

Christianity zealously followed this archetype, but it was Judaism that laid the fixed masculine groundwork for Civilization and it’s Discontents.

Bezelbub

Then we partially agree.

Ruth

Do we really? You fear that if mankind is destroyed, and woman triumphs, that evil will go out of business?

Bezelbub

Let’s hope not.

Ruth

You have nothing to fear. Even after the “Y” chromosome is erased from the flesh of the universe, the code can be salvaged. The data for the male sex exists in all humans. A male can be made from a female.

Bezelbub

Phenomenal. Adam created from Eve’s rib.

Ruth

The mutant sex lurks in all of us!

Bezelbub

What about nesting?

Ruth

Nesting?

Bezelbub

The female conspiracy.

Ruth

Freaky cracker!

Bezelbub

In most species the female does most of the child rearing. Therefor the female code or DNA is more vulnerable. For this reason the female designs a series of obstacles for the men to perform so that the male will not betray the female and perform copulation with another female.

Ruth

That makes sense.

Bezelbub

If the male betrays the female then his odds improve in the spread of his genetic code, likewise the female’s code has a lesser chance of survival. This is why sexual responsibility is so serious and why some female birds have men build nests.

Ruth

Nesting!

Bezelbub

Exactly! If the male is occupied with nest building then he is less likely to cheat on the female. The male will be forced to build a nest for each female. This is why in our society it is customary for the male to work and provide… the human equivalent of nest building.

Ruth

I don’t want your nest.

Bezelbub

But, you want somebody else’s.

Ruth

I will build my own nest.

Bezelbub

I’m going to make sure you can’t. That’s the killer for men. If women can provide the nest then men are useless…. Therefor obsolete! If men are obsolete… they will soon go extinct. I am going to insure that women do not enter the workforce and are incapable of building a nest on their own.

Ruth

So then it’s war! Us against you.

Bezelbub

I wouldn’t have it any other way.

Ruth

When will it end? You can’t win!

Bezelbub

I’m doing my best to not win or lose. Henry Kissinger said that no one will win the war of the sexes because there simply is too much fraternizing with the enemy. The struggle must continue. Let’s suppose you were pregnant.

Ruth

With who’s baby? Not a chance if you think it would be yours.

Bezelbub

Let’s suppose you were pregnant with a child.

Ruth

The hell you say.

Bezelbub

Exactly. Let us suppose you had knowledge that your child would be like an Antichrist.

Ruth

The Antichrist?

Bezelbub

heh heh… whatever you wanna call it.
The one who will bring on the final battle.

Ruth

I would have an abortion

Bezelbub

I should have guessed. You wouldn’t have any reservations?

Ruth

None whatsoever. Why are you inquiring?

Bezelbub

Just wondering.

(script continues with realization that Ruth and Bezelbub are the same person. A schizophrenic.)

Rock The Vote: Stop Fucking People Who Are Opposed to ObamaCare…

I guess I’m not getting laid…

F the Vote w/ Zach Gilford & Eva Amurri from Zach Gilford

via weaselzippers.net

Tiger Woods

Click to Play

…does anyone have any empathy for him right now?