feminism is old fashioned

Pre Islamic Middle East had Matriarchal religions of the snake.

my hypothesis is that Islam was a reaction to this.

a study of Snake based Matriarchal Religion and it’s polarity influence on Islam:

Click to Play

Recession?: Only for Men; Women Gain in Tough Economy

There is discriminatory spending by our government of the stimulus bill. It has gotten so bad that the media is renaming the recession the “Man-cession”. The only sector of the economy that is in growth are jobs that women are stronger at. Pink collar over the last ten years has grown 10%. Keep in mind there isn’t any equivalence between the sexes in other ways because society is unforgiving to unemployed men and we do not have a domestic option. The educational system has also gone out of it’s way to discriminate towards men. and yet our government is still pushing affirmative action in the stimulus bill? someone has to explain to these feminists about social engineering… it has always failed the people. While the Pink Collar fascists still have pictures of Hillary Clinton and her pant suit crew on their profile pictures on facebook, out-of-wedlock births to young women is getting out of hand… and guess what? It isn’t daddy’s fault!

Men are losing jobs at far greater rates than women as the industries they dominate, such as manufacturing, construction, and investment services, are hardest hit by the downturn. Some 1.1 million fewer men are working in the United States than there were a year ago, according to the Labor Department. By contrast, 12,000 more women are working

Read more at debbieschlussel.com or you will get CANCER like Barbara Ehrenreich… you have been warned! bah wah ah ah hah hah

someone has to explain to these feminists about social engineering… it has always failed the people. While the Pink Collar fascists still have pictures of Hillary Clinton and her pant suit crew on their profile pictures on facebook, out-of-wedlock births to young women is getting out of hand… and guess what? It isn’t daddy’s fault!

Inflation-adjusted median income for young families has declined from $44,000 in 1979 to $38,000 in 2007, Sum said. During the same period, as jobs that allowed less-educated men to support a family have diminished, out-of-wedlock births to young women rose to 50 percent of births, from 20 percent in 1980

via boston.com

Over the past couple of decades, the male-female ratio on campuses has been changing dramatically. Women outnumber men by a 4-3 ratio on college campuses. Men currently make up only 43 percent of college graduates. In short, many today acknowledge that there is a crisis of the disappearing educated male.

sexist campus activism of participants in the nation’s 500 college gender studies departments. The conference program, attended by about 100 professors and student affairs personnel, exposed some unpleasant facts: men are “overrepresented” in drug and alcohol abuse, violations of campus regulations, and acts of violence and sexual assault, and they are “underrepresented” in academic programs and campus leadership activities.

Over the past couple of decades, the male-female ratio on campuses has been changing dramatically. Women outnumber men by a 4-3 ratio on college campuses. Men currently make up only 43 percent of college graduates.

In short, many today acknowledge that there is a crisis of the disappearing educated male.

Hostility toward men and masculinity begins in daycare and increases each year thereafter. Sexual harassment training and policies have created an uncertain environment, if not a hostile one, where men have to watch their every word and action lest it be misunderstood or misinterpreted. Some experts criticize a campus “worldview that sees things only in terms of oppressors and the oppressed.” Typically, the few campus men’s studies programs are designed to push an anti-masculinity agenda.

via americanthinker.com

the women shit on us. they take all the jobs. meanwhile affirmative action in the stimulus bill when the industry that is effected by job losses is men’s. the problem is getting worse, but the burden is all men’s

the feminists then demonstrated the death grip they hold over Obama and the leaders of the Democratic Party. The feminists swung into action with noisy accusations that the stimulus discriminated against women because its jobs would go mostly to men.

The feminists had no sympathy with the fact that men were victims of most of the lost jobs because the majority of manufacturing and construction jobs are men’s jobs. The segments of our economy dominated by women — social services, education, health, childcare and welfare — have actually gained jobs during this recession.

Nevertheless, the feminists demanded that half the stimulus jobs be given to women. The feminists worked to achieve this result by directing the stimulus funds into the types of jobs where women predominate and by allocating at least a third of the spending in manufacturing and construction industries to training women for those men’s jobs.

All the feminist organizations joined in the political clatter. They called for a meeting so they could lecture Obama’s economic advisers and hurl their demands that the stimulus package create jobs that women like, such as workplace-comfortable inside jobs with air-conditioned offices and carpeted floors.

As one tactic to intimidate Obama administration officials, the feminists successfully insisted that participants in the meeting be seated in a circle without a table between them — a format that enabled the feminists to be confrontational. The feminists created their own vocabulary to shout at the men, demanding jobs for “human infrastructure” and “human bridges,” which were euphemisms for social service, health-care, childcare and librarian jobs.

via townhall.com

The feminists were well aware that Obama’s chief economist is Larry Summers, the former president of Harvard University, who had already proven himself a pushover for pushy feminists. His embarrassing confrontation with hysterical feminist faculty over academic math and science professorships proved that there is no way to appease the feminists and that apologizing to them only makes matters worse

via townhall.com

60% of college grads and grad school programs like law degrees are occupied by women. I don’t have a problem with this, but it is a little unfair to ask for affirmative action.we idolize Asia’s strong educational ethos, but seem to fear Asia’s strong cultural patriarchal view of the family. strong traditional Jewish values were patriarchal too. I’m not saying that we should turn the world upside down for anyone, but the gender revolution and our school’s ability to create innovators seem to be running parallel. women have strengths. their emotional quotient gets work in the modern world, why are we still doing this to men? Gender Engineering is destructive to all of us.

oh… and stop thinking I hate women. I love women… I want women. they don’t want me because I don’t have a job and they do.

G-spot doesn’t appear to exist say researchers and I am pissed at the ladies who said I could not find it

how many times did the feminists preach to you about this one? Another day, another fiction of the gender engineers. The hope that monoculture could create equivalences between the genders just hit another speed bump.

Some are firm believers The elusive erogenous zone said to exist in some women may be a myth, say researchers who have hunted for it. well I could of told them that, but then the jokes would of been flying Their study in the Journal of Sexual Medicine is the biggest yet, involving 1,800 women, and it found no proof. The King’s College London team believe the G-spot may be a figment of women’s imagination, encouraged by magazines and sex therapists. But sexologist Beverley Whipple who helped popularise the G-spot idea said the work was “flawed”. hey Beverly… why did you popularise it then? Might it be power issues? She said the researchers had discounted the experiences of lesbian or bisexual women and failed to consider the effects of having different sexual partners with different love-making techniques. so only lesbians or bisexuals can attempt variety? oh… I get it… as long it isn’t a man. the moment that talk about Homosexuality then it has to be good… right? typical bias in academia. It’s a wonder we aren’t extinct by now. It is rather irresponsible to claim the existence of an entity that has never been proven and pressurise women and men too Study author Andrea Burri The women in the study, who were all pairs of identical and non-identical twins, were asked whether they had a G-spot. hey,,, now that sounds fun. If one did exist, it would be expected that both identical twins, who have the same genes, would report having one. now eugenics and Lysenkoism? Perhaps no field of scientific inquiry is as likely to be misunderstood and abused as genetics. Part of the misunderstanding arises from archaic views about what genes are and how they are expressed during development. The extreme abuse of genetic information at various times has mainly been attributable to larger efforts to use genetic arguments in order to shape society and science according to political agendas (i.e., eugenics and Lysenkoism). If this is the backdrop against which culture assimilates genetic information, then what will happen as a result of the current genetic revolution? Genetic knowledge and technology are advancing at . . . [Full Text of this Article] via content.nejm.org But this pattern did not emerge and the identical twins were no more likely to share a G-spot than non-identical twins who share only half of their genes. conclusion wrong. end result recorded correctly Mythical Co-author of the study Professor Tim Spector said: “Women may argue that having a G-spot is due to diet or exercise, but in fact it is virtually impossible to find real traits. I think it has something to do with being a manipulative tyrant in bed and not letting men be men. sit back and enjoy the ride ladies. telling us what to do isn’t fun for you either. It’s fine to go looking for the G-spot but do not worry if you don’t find it Sexual psychologist Dr Petra Boynton “This is by far the biggest study ever carried out and shows fairly conclusively that the idea of a G-spot is subjective.” is that what it was? subjective? I could of sworn it meant that you were bullshit. Colleague Andrea Burri was concerned that women who feared they lacked a G-spot might feel inadequate, which she says is unnecessary. notice a man’s feelings aren’t important here “It is rather irresponsible to claim the existence of an entity that has never been proven and pressurise women and men too.” that’s better… thanks for caring about that part, but what about men’s feelings? don’t we have any? Dr Petra Boynton, a sexual psychologist at University College London, said: “It’s fine to go looking for the G-spot but do not worry if you don’t find it. “It should not be the only focus. Everyone is different.” here is the reality: if your woman is really selfish… which most are these days. they like to hop around on top and ignore you… that is if they haven’t rejected men completely because most of us are broke from the abuse The Gräfenberg Spot, or G-Spot, was named in honour of the German gynaecologist Ernst Gräfenberg who described it over 50 years ago and is said to sit in the front wall of the vagina some 2-5cm up. I kept on pressing the button after I heard about it… even in a Cartoon called Southpark…. and it didn’t make her happy. it is the up and down that does it… and frankly that is all over, but relative to an area. also just because you know where that area is… doesn’t mean you know what to do with it. it can make the ladies uncomfortable as well and frankly it is your attitude that is more important… for both sexes. Recently Italian scientists claimed they could locate the G-spot using ultrasound scans. They said they had found an area of thicker tissue among the women reporting orgasms. But specialists warned there could be other reasons for this difference.

via news.bbc.co.uk

Posted via web from noahdavidsimon’s posterous

Hey Rosa Brooks, mommy Barbara Ehrenreich has breast lumps

Barbara Ehrenreich has breast cancer. …I’m now in a good mood. maybe the disease will take her wench daughter too.

“Cancer is not a problem or an illness – it’s a gift. Or so Barbara Ehrenreich was told repeatedly after her diagnosis. But the positive thinkers are wrong, she says: sugar-coating illnesses can exact a dreadful cost”

via guardian.co.uk

Nah it’s great news. it means your days are limited Barb. I’m glad you are dying. you made life miserable for the male sex. Take your feminism and die painfully and slowly. Do us a favor and write an agonizing synopsis of what it feels like to loose your knockers. I’m very curious about all the agonizing details. you know? for posterity at the very least. do I sound bitter?

Our biggest failure in Iraq was listening to the nation builders. we were there to defend ourselves by killing people who had murdered us, not die for the feminists. It was supposed to be reactive not proactive. social control is bad. it is ok to set up boundaries and define a culture within a small border like what Israel does, but to actively conquer with the intent to orchestrate a better society is always a fail. I am not a thug. I believe in free thought for all people and I certainly appreciate women’s right to vote, but I draw the line on the so called “progressive” feminists of the 70s that reflected social engineering ideas like Trofim Lysenko’s. Mary Wollstonecraft is my hero, but Barbara Ehrenreich, Gloria Steinem and Dworkin don’t just go too far, these hags have destroyed enlightenment ideas of equality. they are interested in control of civilization as they see fit. it is no coincidence that Western society began to tumble right around the time of the 70s. the cancer that Ehrenreich has come down with is nothing compared to the cancer she spread.

Barbara Ehrenreich was against the war,

but mainly because she was hostile towards Western men.

She thought we were merely guising our nation building

as a wolf in sheeps clothing. She was wrong.

Our leaders really thought they were liberating women.

we need to start respecting our warriors.

Over the past couple of decades, the male-female ratio on campuses has been changing dramatically. Women outnumber men by a 4-3 ratio on college campuses. Men currently make up only 43 percent of college graduates. In short, many today acknowledge that there is a crisis of the disappearing educated male.

\

sexist campus activism of participants in the nation’s 500 college gender studies departments. The conference program, attended by about 100 professors and student affairs personnel, exposed some unpleasant facts: men are “overrepresented” in drug and alcohol abuse, violations of campus regulations, and acts of violence and sexual assault, and they are “underrepresented” in academic programs and campus leadership activities.

Over the past couple of decades, the male-female ratio on campuses has been changing dramatically. Women outnumber men by a 4-3 ratio on college campuses. Men currently make up only 43 percent of college graduates.

In short, many today acknowledge that there is a crisis of the disappearing educated male.

Hostility toward men and masculinity begins in daycare and increases each year thereafter. Sexual harassment training and policies have created an uncertain environment, if not a hostile one, where men have to watch their every word and action lest it be misunderstood or misinterpreted. Some experts criticize a campus “worldview that sees things only in terms of oppressors and the oppressed.” Typically, the few campus men’s studies programs are designed to push an anti-masculinity agenda.

via americanthinker.com

the women shit on us. they take all the jobs. meanwhile affirmative action in the stimulus bill when the industry that is effected by job losses is men’s. the problem is getting worse, but the burden is all men’s

the feminists then demonstrated the death grip they hold over Obama and the leaders of the Democratic Party. The feminists swung into action with noisy accusations that the stimulus discriminated against women because its jobs would go mostly to men.

The feminists had no sympathy with the fact that men were victims of most of the lost jobs because the majority of manufacturing and construction jobs are men’s jobs. The segments of our economy dominated by women — social services, education, health, childcare and welfare — have actually gained jobs during this recession.

Nevertheless, the feminists demanded that half the stimulus jobs be given to women. The feminists worked to achieve this result by directing the stimulus funds into the types of jobs where women predominate and by allocating at least a third of the spending in manufacturing and construction industries to training women for those men’s jobs.

All the feminist organizations joined in the political clatter. They called for a meeting so they could lecture Obama’s economic advisers and hurl their demands that the stimulus package create jobs that women like, such as workplace-comfortable inside jobs with air-conditioned offices and carpeted floors.

As one tactic to intimidate Obama administration officials, the feminists successfully insisted that participants in the meeting be seated in a circle without a table between them — a format that enabled the feminists to be confrontational. The feminists created their own vocabulary to shout at the men, demanding jobs for “human infrastructure” and “human bridges,” which were euphemisms for social service, health-care, childcare and librarian jobs.

via townhall.com

The feminists were well aware that Obama’s chief economist is Larry Summers, the former president of Harvard University, who had already proven himself a pushover for pushy feminists. His embarrassing confrontation with hysterical feminist faculty over academic math and science professorships proved that there is no way to appease the feminists and that apologizing to them only makes matters worse

via townhall.com

60% of college grads and grad school programs like law degrees are occupied by women. I don’t have a problem with this, but it is a little unfair to ask for affirmative action.we idolize Asia’s strong educational ethos, but seem to fear Asia’s strong cultural patriarchal view of the family. strong traditional Jewish values were patriarchal too. I’m not saying that we should turn the world upside down for anyone, but the gender revolution and our school’s ability to create innovators seem to be running parallel. women have strengths. their emotional quotient gets work in the modern world, why are we still doing this to men? Gender Engineering is destructive to all of us.

oh… and stop thinking I hate women. I love women… I want women. they don’t want me because I don’t have a job and they do.

Andrea Dworkin

in the end her friends betrayed her because she believed in Israel. she was crazy… but there was dignity and honor in her convictions. todays leftist feminist compromisers lack that strength. I’m not a believer in social and gender engineering, but I salute people who fight for something with integrity. We need to respect those who are wrong, but fight a righteous battle because of the pain they endure. it makes no sense for women to endorse cultures where women are not given any dignity. I can argue the difference between equality and equivalence as a man and also acknowledge that Islam gives neither to women.

stop making me your bitch

problem is that most guys can’t get work… and the women shit on us. they take all the jobs. meanwhile affirmative action in the stimulus bill when the industry that is effected by job losses is men’s. the problem is getting worse, but the burden is all men’s

“Because that’s basically what’s happening. When you blur the gender roles, feminize the men and masculinize the women, it’s not a good thing. And with many wives working and their men doing housework, America’s married women who force their husbands to do what was a woman’s traditional role in order to get what was supposed to be a given, essential part of a marriage (sex), it makes a mess of things. Sexual blackmail may have great short-term results, but I’ll bet long-term these marriages aren’t the ones that last. Matriarchies always fail, and not just in nations . . . but also in family households. “

Affirmative Action Strikes Again

60% of college grads and grad school programs like law degrees are occupied by women. I don’t have a problem with this, but it is a little unfair to ask for affirmative action. We idolize Asia’s strong educational ethos, but seem to fear Asia’s strong cultural patriarchal view of the family. strong traditional Jewish values were patriarchal too. I’m not saying that we should turn the world upside down for anyone, but the gender revolution and our school’s ability to create innovators seem to be running parallel. women have strengths. their emotional quotient gets work in the modern world, why are we still doing this to men? Now feminist accusations that the stimulus discriminated against women because its jobs would go mostly to men. they have no sympathy with the fact that men were victims of most of the lost jobs because the majority of manufacturing and construction jobs are men’s jobs. The segments of our economy dominated by women: social services, education, health, childcare and welfare have actually gained jobs during this recession. The feminists demanded half the stimulus jobs be given to women. The feminists conspired to achieve this by pushing the stimulus funds into jobs where women predominate and by moving at least one third of the spending in manufacturing and construction industries to training women for men’s jobs.