#ClimateGate Paul Krugman thinks Fudging of data shows humanity?

December 8, 2009
Paul Krugman of the New York Times considers intentionally fabricated data to be signs of “humanity”, If one were to steal money (as these claims of “Global Warming” will do to people) would it prove humanity or would it prove fraud and immorality? What is humane about poor ethics? Paul Krugman considers Jerusalem occupied territory when there is photographic evidence showing ethnic cleansing of Jews from Jerusalem in 1948 when the city was two thirds Jewish. Changing the data to fit the results is not humanity. Lying to bilk people of their property is criminal.


“Of course, if things go well in Copenhagen, the usual suspects will go wild. We’ll hear cries that the whole notion of global warming is a hoax perpetrated by a vast scientific conspiracy, as demonstrated by stolen e-mail messages that show — well, actually all they show is that scientists are human, but never mind. We’ll also, however, hear cries that climate-change policies will destroy jobs and growth.”


Zionist Conspiracy: Gropenhagen – Be sustainable – don’t buy sex?

December 6, 2009

Copenhagen Mayor Ritt Bjerregaard sent postcards to city hotels warning summit guests not to patronize Danish sex workers during the upcoming conference. Now, the prostitutes have struck back, offering free sex to anyone who produces one of the warnings.

Copenhagen’s city council in conjunction with Lord Mayor Ritt Bjerregaard sent postcards out to 160 Copenhagen hotels urging COP15 guests and delegates to ‘Be sustainable – don’t buy sex’.

“Dear hotel owner, we would like to urge you not to arrange contacts between hotel guests and prostitutes,” the approach to hotels says.

Now, Copenhagen prostitutes are up in arms, saying that the council has no business meddling in their affairs. They have now offered free sex to anyone who can produce one of the offending postcards and their COP15 identity card, according to the Web site avisen.dk.

Discrimination

According to the report, the move has been organized by the Sex Workers Interest Group (SIO).

“This is sheer discrimination. Ritt Bjerregaard is abusing her position as Lord Mayor in using her power to prevent us carrying out our perfectly legal job. I don’t understand how she can be allowed to contact people in this way,” SIO Spokeswoman Susanne Møller tells avisen.dk.

Møller adds that it is reprehensible and unfair that Copenhagen politicians have chosen to use the UN Climate Summit as a platform for a hetz against sex workers.

“But they’ve done it and we have to defend ourselves,” Møller says.

Edited by Julian Isherwood

*      
Now there are so many wonderful points to made about this!  First, note the Spiegel name for
Copenhagen as Gropenhagen.  Just think of what Sigmund Freud could do with that!

*       Second, note how the “sex workers” in the article are offering to provide free services for those who are prostituting themselves to the Global Warming pseudo-scientific cult, and doing so within days of all the “Climategate” revelations about how so much of the global warming hysteria is really based on fraud.  If you have not been following THAT story, take a look at http://frontpagemag.com/2009/12/04/the-con-artists-of-climategate-by-floyd-and-mary-beth-brown/

*       Third, note how the mayor of Copenhagen objected to the hankying and the pankying on grounds that it was not “sustainable.”  As an economist I have been arguing before students for decades that “sustainable” is nothing more than a PC nonsense term, one that is not based on any actual understanding of environmental issues, problems, or solutions.  So it is nice to be proven right by Hers-Honor, the mayor of Copenhagen.  Of course, she was using it (see above story) to pander to the Global Warming circus members coming into town.  But she managed to discredit the term deliciously.

*       Fourth, I gotta tell you, I am really feeling more out of it and geezerly as time goes by.  Why, just the other week, I went into a clothing store on campus to buy a gym towel.  There were two young female students standing in line in front of me to pay for their new string bikini.  The clerk told them it would cost about $30.  Being a warm blooded economist, my mind raced, naturally, and so I immediately commented to all present that if one converts that into an equivalent price per square meter, then it is REALLY expensive!  Everyone in the store just stared at me and shook their heads in pity.

*        Which brings me to the above news story about “sex workers.”  I had to read the story a few times before I understood what it was referring to.  You see, I am from the generation that still referred to such folks as hookers, except for the black kids in my neighborhood, who preferred the term “hoes.”  So whenever I read news stories about “sex workers,” I always assume that they are referring to aging men over 50 with prostate problems who really have to work hard in order to participate at all with their wives.  I guess one could term them prostatutes.

In any case, I finally realized why Bill Clinton was so anxious to attend the conference.    

 


ClimateGate

December 6, 2009

Unable to address the substantive issues – its hacks being quite incapable of research or analysis – the media have launched into reams of speculation about the “Climategate” leaks, all based on the single fact that, at the second or third attempt, the “whistleblower” uploaded the data onto a Russian server (webpage header grab above).

The Mail on Sunday, without spending any effort telling its readers what the issue is about, devotes a two-page spread to the most amazing tosh, built on entirely unsupported speculation. It is a classic of its kind.

Not to be outdone, The Times follows in its wake, with: “UN officials likened the Climategate controversy to Watergate today, claiming that computer hackers who stole thousands of e-mails sent by a senior climate scientist were probably paid to do it by people intent on undermining the Copenhagen summit.”

And here we have our old friend Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, vice-chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). He is quoted (again) saying that the theft from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit was not the work of amateur climate sceptics but a sophisticated and well-funded attempt to destroy public confidence in the science of manmade climate change.

He said the fact that the e-mails were first uploaded to a sceptic website from a computer in Russia was an indication that the culprit was paid.

At least his comments are entirely consistent with his religion: totally unsubstantiated and without a scintilla of good evidence. But how typical of the media that they should give this garbage house room when they are ignoring the massive scientific fraud under their very noses.


Marginal Revolution: The decentralization of science, including climate science

December 4, 2009

it’s science, not ARPA. Decentralized systems like the internet are designed for information defense and not asking the citizens for their tax dollars.


these guys are scrambling to explain why they were caught red handed exploiting the people:
“I see science, including climate science, as very much a decentralized process, based on the collective efforts of thousands of researchers. The evidence for our current understanding of climate change also comes from a wide variety of disciplines, including chemistry, meteorology, oceanography, geography, tree ring studies, ice sheet studies, and a good body of theory, which has held up well. These results all point in broadly similar directions. Call me naive but, with apologies to Robert Sugden, I don’t think many scientific results depend on what comes out of East Anglia, even if you include its emailing affiliates from Penn State and the like. Even very, very simple climate models generate many of the basic results.”

are you talking about science or a priesthood? the objective data should of been shared and not hoarded from the centralized network. what you are describing is worse then fudging the data.

Posted via web from noahdavidsimon’s posterous


Boxer: Hackers should face criminal probe over ‘Climategate’ – The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room

December 3, 2009

Boxer, the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said that the recently released e-mails, showing scientists allegedly overstating the case for climate change, should be treated as a crime.

“You call it ‘Climategate’; I call it ‘E-mail-theft-gate,’” she said during a committee meeting. “Whatever it is, the main issue is, Are we facing global warming or are we not? I’m looking at these e-mails, that, even though they were stolen, are now out in the public.”

and the lesson is that we should prosecute Hackers for exposing the fact that our government is exposed in a multi Billion dollar theft. She’s angry that they were caught? Those hackers are heros. The government and those scientists worked togther to intentionally con us into believeing the biggest scam of the century based on lies to make us pay for breathing…
and she is angry about HACKERS? oh noes! throw them off facebook and twitter. These people could be worse then the theJIDF.org lol. The powers that be don’t like it when the people stand up against hypocrisy.

Posted via web from noahdavidsimon’s posterous


Chicken Little and Climategate

December 2, 2009

Absent that proof, everything they represent—including the thousands of jobs they provide—vanishes. This is what’s known as a vested interest, and vested interests are an enemy of sound science.

According to one of the documents leaked from his center, between 2000 and 2006 Mr. Jones was the recipient (or co-recipient) of some $19 million worth of research grants, a sixfold increase over what he’d been awarded in the 1990s.

Why did the money pour in so quickly? Because the climate alarm kept ringing so loudly: The louder the alarm, the greater the sums. And who better to ring it than people like Mr. Jones, one of its likeliest beneficiaries?

some brave people (not me I was a believer in global warming), were not afraid to question the evidence. thanks to them we now realize that CAP and TRADE was a scam that we were all confused into believing. this isn’t the little boy who cried wolf… this was a concerted effort to bilk the public of their money for greedy purposed.

“The SKY is falling”… er warming… indeed it wasn’t. hard lesson learned. for former liberals such as myself


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.